Published June 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Interlayer connectivity reconstruction for multilayer brain networks using phase oscillator models

  • 1. Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft (Netherlands)
  • 3. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurology, Brain Simulation Section, Berlin (Germany)
  • 4. School of Mathematics and Statistics, University College Dublin, Dublin (Ireland)
  • 5. Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Povo (Italy)
  • 6. Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 7. Amsterdam Movement Science & Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 8. School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham (United Kingdom)

Description

Large-scale neurophysiological networks are often reconstructed from band-pass filtered time series derived from magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. Common practice is to reconstruct these networks separately for different frequency bands and to treat them independently. Recent evidence suggests that this separation may be inadequate, as there can be significant coupling between frequency bands (interlayer connectivity). A multilayer network approach offers a solution to analyze frequency-specific networks in one framework. We propose to use a recently developed network reconstruction method in conjunction with phase oscillator models to estimate interlayer connectivity that optimally fits the empirical data. This approach determines interlayer connectivity based on observed frequency-specific time series of the phase and a connectome derived from diffusion weighted imaging. The performance of this interlayer reconstruction method was evaluated in-silico. Our reconstruction of the underlying interlayer connectivity agreed to very high degree with the ground truth. Subsequently, we applied our method to empirical resting-state MEG data obtained from healthy subjects and reconstructed two-layered networks consisting of either alpha-to-beta or theta-to-gamma band connectivity. Our analysis revealed that interlayer connectivity is dominated by a multiplex structure, i.e. by one-to-one interactions for both alpha-to-beta band and theta-to-gamma band networks. For theta–gamma band networks, we also found a plenitude of interlayer connections between distant nodes, though weaker connectivity relative to the one-to-one connections. Our work is an stepping stone towards the identification of interdependencies across frequency-specific networks. Our results lay the ground for the use of the promising multilayer framework in this field with more-informed and justified interlayer connections. (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac066d

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
New Journal of Physics
Journal Volume
23
Journal Issue
6
Journal Page Range
[15 p.]
ISSN
1367-2630

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53096263
Subject category
S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
Descriptors DEI
BRAIN; GROUND TRUTH MEASUREMENTS; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; OSCILLATORS
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT; NERVOUS SYSTEM; ORGANS