Published 2015 | Version v1
Miscellaneous

System impacts of accelerated transfer of used nuclear fuel to dry storage - 15220

  • 1. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 (United States)

Description

In the wake of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks, and again after the March 11, 2011, accident at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi station from the Great East Japan Earthquake/tsunami, concern was expressed regarding security of current spent fuel storage practices in the United States. An approach recurrently proposed to reduce the potential for fire and the release of radionuclides in an accident or sabotage scenario is to reduce the loading of the reactor fuel pools, which are frequently maintained near their full capacity at many reactor sites in the U.S. We assess the impact on the waste management system of different scenarios for accelerating the schedule of used nuclear fuel (UNF) transfer from reactor pools to dry storage casks. We consider scenarios where the spent fuel pools are drawn down to 50% or 25% of full capacity over 5- or 10-year schedules. The scenarios include status quo, where UNF continues to remain in dry storage at the reactor sites, as well as scenarios with UNF transfer to interim storage and eventually to a mined geologic repository. The primary purpose is to evaluate how the different scenarios for accelerating the transfer of UNF to at-reactor dry storage would affect the performance of the entire UNF management system. Areas that were considered include an estimate of the additional system costs that could be incurred and where the existing infrastructure at the reactor sites would come under stress from the transfer demands. This study considered only the fuel-handling logistics and rough-order-of-magnitude cost at reactor sites, interim storage facility, and operations to package UNF into disposal canisters. The effects of minimum fuel age that could be transferred and the accelerated transfer starting date are also examined, but found to have relatively little effect. Impacts on safety and worker dose are not evaluated quantitatively, although effects can be inferred from increases in handling operations, etc. from the scenarios considered. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from WM Symposia, Inc., PO Box 27646, 85285-7646 Tempe, AZ (US)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Pagination
15 p.
Report number
INIS-US--19-WM-15220

Conference

Title
Annual Waste Management Symposium
Acronym
WM2015
Dates
15-19 Mar 2015
Place
Phoenix, AZ (United States)

Optional Information

Notes
5 refs.; Available online at: http://archive.wmsym.org/2015/index.html