Risk informed decision-making and its ethical basis
Description
In decision-making under uncertainty there are two main questions that need to be evaluated: (i) What are the future consequences and associated uncertainties of an action, and (ii) what is a good (or right) decision or action. Philosophically these issues are categorized as epistemic questions (i.e. questions of knowledge) and ethical questions (i.e. questions of moral and norms). This paper discusses the second issue, and evaluates different risk management approaches for establishing good decisions, using different ethical theories as a basis. These theories include the utilitarian ethics of Bentley and Mills, and deontological ethics of Kant, Rawls and Habermas. The risk management approaches include cost-benefit analysis (CBA), minimum safety criterion, the ALARP principle and the precautionary principle
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.12.018Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ress.2006.12.018;
- PII
- S0951-8320(07)00018-X;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Reliability Engineering and System Safety
- Journal Volume
- 93
- Journal Issue
- 2
- Journal Page Range
- p. 197-205
- ISSN
- 0951-8320
- CODEN
- RESSEP
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 39065472
- Subject category
- S42: ENGINEERING;
- Descriptors DEI
- COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ETHICAL ASPECTS; HAZARDS; MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY
- Descriptors DEC
- ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.