Noninvasive CT-based hemodynamic assessment of coronary lesions derived from fast computational analysis. A comparison against fractional flow reserve
Creators
- Siogkas, Panagiotis K.1
- Anagnostopoulos, Constantinos D.2
- Liga, Riccardo3, 4
- Exarchos, Themis P.5
- Sakellarios, Antonis I.5
- Rigas, George5
- Scholte, Arthur J.H.A.6
- Papafaklis, M.I.7
- Michalis, Lampros K.7
- Loggitsi, Dimitra8
- Pelosi, Gualtiero9
- Parodi, Oberdan9
- Neglia, Danilo9
- Maaniitty, Teemu10
- Knuuti, Juhani10
- Fotiadis, Dimitrios I.7, 5, 1
- 1. University of Ioannina, Unit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Ioannina (Greece)
- 2. Academy of Athens, Center for Experimental Surgery, Clinical and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation, Athens (Greece)
- 3. University Hospital Zurich, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zürich (Switzerland)
- 4. University Hospital of Pisa, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Department, Pisa (Italy)
- 5. Biomedical Research Institute - FORTH, Ioannina (Greece)
- 6. Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Leiden (Netherlands)
- 7. University of Ioannina, Michaelideion Cardiac Center, Dept. of Cardiology in Medical School, Ioannina (Greece)
- 8. CT & MRI Department Hygeia-Mitera Hospitals, Athens (Greece)
- 9. Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio and CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa (Italy)
- 10. University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku PET Centre, Turku (Finland)
Description
Application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to three-dimensional CTCA datasets has been shown to provide accurate assessment of the hemodynamic significance of a coronary lesion. We aim to test the feasibility of calculating a novel CTCA-based virtual functional assessment index (vFAI) of coronary stenoses > 30% and 90% by using an automated in-house-developed software and to evaluate its efficacy as compared to the invasively measured fractional flow reserve (FFR). In 63 patients with chest pain symptoms and intermediate (20-90%) pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease undergoing CTCA and invasive coronary angiography with FFR measurement, vFAI calculations were performed after 3D reconstruction of the coronary vessels and flow simulations using the finite element method. A total of 74 vessels were analyzed. Mean CTCA processing time was 25( 10) min. There was a strong correlation between vFAI and FFR, (R = 0.93, p < 0.001) and a very good agreement between the two parameters by the Bland-Altman method of analysis. The mean difference of measurements from the two methods was 0.03 (SD = 0.033), indicating a small systematic overestimation of the FFR by vFAI. Using a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal vFAI cutoff value for identifying an FFR threshold of 0.8 was 0.82 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.88). vFAI can be effectively derived from the application of computational fluid dynamics to three-dimensional CTCA datasets. In patients with coronary stenosis severity > 30% and 90%, vFAI performs well against FFR and may efficiently distinguish between hemodynamically significant from non-significant lesions. (orig.)
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5781-8Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 29
- Journal Issue
- 4
- Journal Page Range
- p. 2117-2126
- ISSN
- 0938-7994
- CODEN
- EURAE3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 50067980
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- AUTOMATION; BLOOD CIRCULATION; BLOOD FLOW; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTER CODES; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARIES; CORRELATIONS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID MECHANICS; PAIN; THREE-DIMENSIONAL CALCULATIONS
- Descriptors DEC
- ARTERIES; BLOOD VESSELS; BODY; CALCULATION METHODS; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; EVALUATION; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; MECHANICS; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; ORGANS; SIMULATION; SYMPTOMS; TOMOGRAPHY