Published January 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Co-benefits and synergies between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review

  • 1. Hiroshima University, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences (Japan)

Description

Highlights: • Adaptation needs to be considered at parity with mitigation. • Co-benefits and synergies between adaptation and mitigation measures are explored. • Relatively Extensive knowledge exists on co-benefits, but synergies are understudied. • Green infrastructure measures show greater potential for offering co-benefits. • Measures related to urban greening and transport are more likely to provide synergies. Accounting for over 70% of global CO2 emissions, cities are major contributors to climate change. Acknowledging this, urban climate change adaptation and mitigation plans are increasingly developed to make progress toward enhancing climate resilience. While there is consensus that focusing on both adaptation and mitigation is necessary for addressing climate change impacts, better understanding of their interactions is needed to efficiently maximize their potentials. This paper, first, provides a bibliographic analysis to map existing knowledge regarding adaptation-mitigation interactions. This is done using methods such as bibliographic coupling, co-citation analysis, and co-occurrence analysis. Then, drawing on the literature, this study explores two types of interactions between adaptation and mitigation measures, namely co-benefits and synergies. These interactions are explored through analyzing evidence reported in the literature on different measures related to sectors such as energy, transportation, waste, water, green infrastructure, urban planning, and governance. Results of the bibliographic analysis show that there is a lack of research in the Global South. Results of the detailed content analysis show that many measures can provide co-benefits and synergies. Measures related to green infrastructure, buildings, energy systems, and, transportation are particularly capable of providing co-benefits. In addition, it was found that appropriate levels of density, promotion of public transportation, and urban greenery are measures that are more likely to provide synergistic benefits if combined with other adaptation and/or mitigation measures. This study highlights the need for more empirical research to better understand the magnitude of synergistic benefits between different measures.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141642

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141642;
PII
S0048969720351718;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
750
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54063873
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
CARBON DIOXIDE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CLIMATES; ENERGY SYSTEMS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; URBAN AREAS; WASTE WATER
Descriptors DEC
CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; CLIMATIC CHANGE; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; LIQUID WASTES; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; WASTES; WATER

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.