Published August 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Intelligent techniques for forecasting electricity consumption of buildings

  • 1. Faculty of Engineering, Science and the Built Environment, London South Bank University, London, SE1 0AA (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mirpur 10250, AJK (Pakistan)
  • 3. School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad (Pakistan)
  • 4. Department of Computer Systems Engineering, Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mirpur, 10250, AJK (Pakistan)
  • 5. Department of Electrical (Power) Engineering, Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mirpur, 10250, AJK (Pakistan)

Description

Highlights: • Forecasting of daily electricity consumption for administration buildings. • Use of different intelligent forecasting techniques, i.e. MR, GP, ANN, DNN, SVM. • ANN outperforms all other forecasting techniques. The increasing trend in building sector's energy demand calls for reliable and robust energy consumption forecasting models. This study aims to compare prediction capabilities of five different intelligent system techniques by forecasting electricity consumption of an administration building located in London, United Kingdom. These five techniques are; Multiple Regression (MR), Genetic Programming (GP), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Deep Neural Network (DNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The prediction models are developed based on five years of observed data of five different parameters such as solar radiation, temperature, wind speed, humidity and weekday index. Weekday index is an important parameter introduced to differentiate between working and non-working days. First four years data is used for training the models and to obtain prediction data for fifth year. Finally, the predicted electricity consumption of all models is compared with actual consumption of fifth year. Results demonstrate that ANN performs better than all other four techniques with a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 6% whereas MR, GP, SVM and DNN have MAPE of 8.5%, 8.7%, 9% and 11%, respectively. The applicability of this study could span to other building categories and will help energy management teams to forecast energy consumption of various buildings.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.155

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.155;
PII
S036054421830999X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy (Oxford)
Journal Volume
157
Journal Page Range
p. 886-893
ISSN
0360-5442
CODEN
ENEYDS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.