Published December 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Results of the joint IAEA/ARPANSA intercomparison exercise on whole body dosemeters for photons in Asia and the Pacific region

  • 1. Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission, National Council for Scientific Research, PO Box 11-8281, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2260 (Lebanon)
  • 2. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie, Victoria 3085 (Australia)
  • 3. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, PO Box 100, Vienna 1400 (Austria)
  • 4. National Radiation Protection Department, Iranian Nuclear Regulatory Authority, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, PO Box 14395-836, Av. Kargar Shomali, Tehran (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
  • 5. Radiation Protection Department, Kuwait City, Al Sharq area (Kuwait)
  • 6. Malaysian Nuclear Agency, Ministry of Energy, Science, Technology, Environment and Climate Change, Bangi, 43000 Kajang, Selangor (Malaysia)
  • 7. Faculty of Science, Nepal Academy of Science and Technology, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, GPO 3323 Kathmandu (Nepal)

Description

An intercomparison exercise (IC) on whole body dosemeters to determine the quantity personal dose equivalent Hp (10) in photon radiation fields was jointly organised and conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) for individual monitoring services (IMS) in Asia and the Pacific region. This was arranged to help the IMS in the region to achieve a more accurate dosimetry service and to improve their performance. Twenty-four IMS participated in this IC. Four sets of dosemeters were irradiated using X-ray and gamma radiation qualities at 0 deg. and 20 deg. angle of incidence, respectively. All the IMS provided results that were within the acceptable limits defined by the IAEA. However, only a minority of participants reported confidence intervals that included the reference dose, for each exposure scenario. For few systems, the overall performance could be significantly improved by reviewing calibration procedures. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncz182

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Journal Volume
187
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 418-425
ISSN
0144-8420

Optional Information

Notes
18 refs.