Published January 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

A matrix of morphology and distribution of calcifications in the breast: Analysis of 849 vacuum-assisted biopsies

  • 1. Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main (Germany)
  • 2. Institute of Radiology (RZI), Klinikum Frankfurt/Main – Höchst, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Frankfurt/Main (Germany)
  • 3. Diagnostic Breast Center Turmcarée, Mammography Screening, Frankfurt/Main (Germany)
  • 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Frankfurt/Main-Höchst (Germany)
  • 5. Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Frankfurt/Main-Höchst (Germany)
  • 6. OptiPath, Pathology Associates, Frankfurt/Main (Germany)
  • 7. Asthenis, Medical Data Management, Aschheim (Germany)

Description

Highlights: • A diagnostic matrix of morphologies and distributions of calcifications enables their standardized classification into BI-RADS categories. • 285/328/208/29 groups of calcifications were prospectively classified as BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C/5 correlating with a risk for malignancy of 16%/27%/55%/90%. • Overall, 275/849 (32%) groups of calcifications were found to be malignant. - Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the likelihood of malignancy in prospectively categorized BI-RADS 4 and BI-RADS 5 calcifications. Material and methods: This analysis included 849 women who underwent vacuum biopsy for BI-RADS 4 (with the subgroups 4A, 4B and 4C) or BI-RADS 5 calcifications between February 2007 and May 2015. Calcifications were classified according to the morphology and distribution descriptors of the BI-RADS lexicon (BI-RADS 4th edition lexicon). A standardized scheme (matrix) was used to combine the characteristics of the grouped calcifications with the BI-RADS assessment category. Results: Overall, 275/849 (32%) lesions were found to be malignant. 285/327/208/29 calcified lesions were prospectively classified as BI-RADS 4A/4B/4C/5 indicating a risk for malignancy of 16%/27%/55%/90%, respectively. The morphology descriptors predicted the risk for malignancy as follows: typically benign (n = 55): 2%; indeterminate (n = 676): 27%; typically malignant (n = 118): 80%. The distribution descriptors correlated with a malignant histology as follows: diffuse (n = 0); round or oval (n = 261): 22%; regional (n = 398): 33%; segmental (n = 106): 42%; linear or branching (n = 85): 55%. There was a significant difference between the descriptor categories (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: A standard scheme combining the morphology and distribution characteristics proved to be a helpful tool in diagnosis of calcifications, bridging the gap between description and classification of these lesions.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.11.022

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.11.022;
PII
S0720-048X(16)30373-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
86
Journal Page Range
p. 221-226
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49011355
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BIOPSY; BRANCHING RATIO; CALCIUM; MAMMARY GLANDS
Descriptors DEC
ALKALINE EARTH METALS; BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; ELEMENTS; GLANDS; METALS; ORGANS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.