Published December 1, 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Temporal constraints on predation risk assessment in a changing world

  • 1. Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2 (Canada)
  • 2. School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville Qld4811 (Australia)
  • 3. ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville Qld4811 (Australia)
  • 4. School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane Qld4072 (Australia)
  • 5. Department of Biomedical Sciences, WCVM, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7W 5B4 (Canada)

Description

Habitat degradation takes various forms and likely represents the most significant threat to our global biodiversity. Recently, we have seen considerable attention paid to increasing global CO2 emissions which lead to ocean acidification (OA). Other stressors, such as changing levels of ultraviolet radiation (UVR), also impact biodiversity but have received much less attention in the recent past. Here we examine fundamental questions about temporal aspects of risk assessment by coral reef damselfish and provide critical insights into how OA and UVR influence this assessment. Chemical cues released during a predator attack provide a rich source of information that other prey animals use to mediate their risk of predation and are the basis of the majority of trait-mediated indirect interactions in aquatic communities. However, we have surprisingly limited information about temporal aspects of risk assessment because we lack knowledge about how long chemical cues persist after they are released into the environment. Here, we showed that under ambient CO2 conditions (∼ 385 μatm), alarm cues of ambon damselfish (Pomacentrus amboinensis) did not degrade within 30 min in the absence of ultraviolet radiation (UVR), but were degraded within 15 min when the CO2 was increased to ∼ 905 μatm. In experiments that used filters to eliminate UVR, we found minimal degradation of alarm cues within 30 min, whereas under ambient UVR conditions, alarm cues were completely degraded within 15 min. Moreover, in the presence of both UVR and elevated CO2, alarm cues were broken down within 5 min. Our results highlight that alarm cues degrade surprisingly quickly under natural conditions and that anthropogenic changes have the potential to dramatically change rates of cue degradation in the wild. This has considerable implications for risk assessment and consequently the importance of trait-mediated indirect interactions in coral-reef communities. - Highlights: • We have limited understanding of how long chemical alarm cues persist after release. • We examined the effect of UV radiation and CO2 on persistence of fish alarm cues. • Alarm cues of coral reef fish degrade surprisingly quickly under natural conditions. • Anthropogenic changes have the potential to change rates of cue degradation. • Trait-mediated indirect interactions will be altered with a changing climate

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.059

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.059;
PII
S0048-9697(14)01238-8;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
500-501
Journal Issue
Complete
Journal Page Range
p. 332-338
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47012656
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATIC CHANGE; CORAL REEFS; FISHES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES DIVERSITY; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION
Descriptors DEC
ANIMALS; AQUATIC ORGANISMS; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; GEOLOGIC STRUCTURES; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; RADIATIONS; REEFS; VERTEBRATES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.