Published 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Supplementary comparison APMP.RI(I)-S1 of standards for absorbed dose to water in 60Co gamma radiation at radiation processing dose levels

  • 1. Office of Atoms for Peace, 16 Vibhavadi Rangsit Road, Ladyao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, (Thailand)
  • 2. Institute of Nuclear Energy Research,No.1000, Wenhua Rd., Jiaan Village, Longtan Township, Taoyuan Country, 32546, Taiwan (China)
  • 3. Division of Ionizing Radiation, National Institute of Metrology, No.18, Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Beijing 100013, P.R.China (China)
  • 4. National Institute for Standards, Department of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, Quality manager Tersa Street El-Haram El-Giza, P.O. Box: 136 Giza, El-Giza (Egypt)
  • 5. Malaysian Nuclear Agency - Nuclear Malaysia, Bangi, 4300 Kajang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, (Malaysia)
  • 6. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, 619 Lower Plenty Road, Yallambie 3085, (Australia)

Description

Four national standards for absorbed dose to water in 60Co gamma radiation at the dose levels used in radiation processing have been compared over the range 0.1 kGy to 50 kGy using alanine dosimeters of the Office of Atoms for Peace (OAP) as transfer dosimeters. The comparison was piloted by the OAP who also participated. Two laboratories from the original six were forced to withdraw due to equipment problems. The results at low doses (0.1 kGy) showed a much wider spread (up to 17%) than at the other doses, most likely as a result of random variations in the alanine readout at OAP at these dose levels. Results in the 0.1 kGy range were excluded from the analysis because the variation between the laboratories' doses is overshadowed by the variation in the readout of the alanine. Above 1 kGy the results indicated reasonable agreement between the laboratories, with the majority of results within 2 % of the reference value. All of these results were within two combined standard uncertainties of the reference value, with the exception of the INER at 50 kGy point which was within three combined standard uncertainties. Within the stated uncertainties, the results establish the equivalence of the laboratories at radiation processing levels, for the range in which they participated: NIS (3 - 10) kGy, NIM (3 - 30) kGy, INER (3 - 50) kGy, OAP (3 - 50) kGy. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/58/1A/06021

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Metrologia
Journal Volume
58
Journal Issue
no.1A
Journal Page Range
p. 06021.1-06021.23
ISSN
0026-1394

Optional Information

Notes
9 refs.