Published February 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

Women's experiences of mammography: A thematic evaluation of the literature

  • 1. Northern General Hospital Sheffield (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Sheffield Hallam University (United Kingdom)

Description

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyse relevant literature to understand women's experiences of mammography-both screening and symptomatic. Method: A structured literature search was performed to locate relevant research. Research articles published between 2002 and 2013 were identified in CINAHL, MEDLINE and Science Direct. The quality of the research was assessed using an appropriate critical appraisal tool to enable a systematic and consistent assessment. Results: Qualitative thematic analysis of the literature identified five themes: fear, pain and discomfort, waiting, the physical environment and staff interactions. Whilst it is accepted that women's experiences are unique and diverse, literature suggested that these themes do influence women's experiences. Conclusion: Women's experiences of mammography were not limited to the examinations alone but encompassed the entire encounter. The themes identified influenced women's experiences and their perception of care

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.06.010

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radi.2014.06.010;
PII
S1078-8174(14)00094-7;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiography (London 1995)
Journal Volume
21
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 84-88
ISSN
1078-8174

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46124501
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; MAMMARY GLANDS; PAIN; SCREENING; WOMEN
Descriptors DEC
ANIMALS; BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; FEMALES; GLANDS; MAMMALS; MAN; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; PRIMATES; RADIOLOGY; SYMPTOMS; VERTEBRATES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.