Published September 1994 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy in the diagnosis of ligamentous and meniscal tears of the knee

  • 1. Mitsubishi General Hospital, Nagasaki (Japan)

Description

We prospectively studied 20 patients with suspected ligamentous or meniscal tears of the knee. They were examined by both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy. The accuracy of the diagnoses from MRI compared with arthroscopy was 90% for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), 100% for the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), 90% for the medial meniscus (MM), and 95% for the lateral meniscus (LM). But there were 2 'false positive' ACL tears, 1 'false positive' MM tear, 1 'false negative' MM tear, and 1 'false negative' LM tear. We thought that we can reduce these 'false positive' and 'false negative' findings by describing the best conditions to take MRI for ligamentous or meniscal tears of the knee, or raising the ability to interpret MRI findings. However it is probable that the MRI findings are different from the arthroscopic findings, because MRI is more sensitive to intermeniscal tears and there is the dead angle of the arthroscope in the knee to be taken into consideration. (author)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Seikei Geka To Saigai Geka
Journal Volume
43
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 1413-1418.
ISSN
0037-1033
CODEN
SGSGBB

INIS

Country of Publication
Japan
Country of Input or Organization
Japan
INIS RN
26024757
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ACCURACY; BONE JOINTS; INJURIES; NMR IMAGING; SENSITIVITY; SKELETAL DISEASES; SPECIFICITY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; ORGANS; SKELETON