Published December 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

The properties of SIRT, TVM, and DART for 3D imaging of tubular domains in nanocomposite thin-films and sections

  • 1. Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI), P.O. Box 902, 5600 AX Eindhoven (Netherlands)
  • 2. Laboratory of Materials and Interface Chemistry, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, Den Dolech 2, 5612 AZ Eindhoven (Netherlands)
  • 3. EMAT, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 Antwerp (Belgium)
  • 4. Centrum Wiskunde and Informatica, Science Park 123, NL-1098XG Amsterdam (Netherlands)

Description

In electron tomography, the fidelity of the 3D reconstruction strongly depends on the employed reconstruction algorithm. In this paper, the properties of SIRT, TVM and DART reconstructions are studied with respect to having only a limited number of electrons available for imaging and applying different angular sampling schemes. A well-defined realistic model is generated, which consists of tubular domains within a matrix having slab-geometry. Subsequently, the electron tomography workflow is simulated from calculated tilt-series over experimental effects to reconstruction. In comparison with the model, the fidelity of each reconstruction method is evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively based on global and local edge profiles and resolvable distance between particles. Results show that the performance of all reconstruction methods declines with the total electron dose. Overall, SIRT algorithm is the most stable method and insensitive to changes in angular sampling. TVM algorithm yields significantly sharper edges in the reconstruction, but the edge positions are strongly influenced by the tilt scheme and the tubular objects become thinned. The DART algorithm markedly suppresses the elongation artifacts along the beam direction and moreover segments the reconstruction which can be considered a significant advantage for quantification. Finally, no advantage of TVM and DART to deal better with fewer projections was observed. - Highlights: • Dose and tilt-scheme dependence of SIRT, TVM and DART tomograms are quantified. • SIRT is the most stable method and insensitive to changes in angular sampling. • TVM significantly reduces noise but objects become thinned. • DART markedly suppresses the elongation artifacts. • No advantage of TVM and DART for fewer projections is observed

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.08.005

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.08.005;
PII
S0304-3991(14)00155-7;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Ultramicroscopy (Amsterdam)
Journal Volume
147
Journal Page Range
p. 137-148
ISSN
0304-3991
CODEN
ULTRD6

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46101045
Subject category
S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE;
Descriptors DEI
ALGORITHMS; BEAMS; DISTANCE; ELONGATION; MINIMIZATION; NOISE; PERFORMANCE; RADIATION DOSES; SAMPLING; SIMULATION; SLABS; THIN FILMS; TOMOGRAPHY
Descriptors DEC
DEFORMATION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DOSES; FILMS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; OPTIMIZATION

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.