There is a newer version of the record available.

Published October 2020 | Version v1
Journal article

Dynamics in treatment response and disease progression of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with focus on BRAF status and primary tumor location: analysis of untreated RAS-wild-type mCRC patients receiving FOLFOXIRI either with or without panitumumab in the VOLFI trial (AIO KRK0109)

  • 1. Charité University Medicine Berlin. Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CVK/CCM) (Germany)
  • 2. Klinikum Esslingen (Germany)
  • 3. Klinik für Innere Medizin III, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn (Germany)
  • 4. Universitätsklinik Marburg (Germany)
  • 5. St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus Paderborn (Germany)
  • 6. Stadtisches Klinikum Dessau (Germany)
  • 7. Universitätsklinikum Ulm (Germany)
  • 8. Leopoldina Krankenhaus (Germany)
  • 9. University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University. Medical Faculty Mannheim, Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (Germany)
  • 10. LMU Klinikum. Klinik Und Poliklinik für Radiologie (Germany)
  • 11. ClinAssess (Germany)
  • 12. Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale) (Germany)
  • 13. Franziskus-Hospital Harderberg (Germany)
  • 14. German Cancer Research Center. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) (Germany)
  • 15. University Hospital Munich (LMU). Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (Germany)
  • 16. Ruhr-University Bochum. Institute of Pathology (Germany)
  • 17. Ruhr-University Bochum. Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital (Germany)

Description

Purpose

: In mCRC, disease dynamics may play a critical role in the understanding of long-term outcome. We evaluated depth of response (DpR), time to DpR, and post-DpR survival as relevant endpoints.

Methods

: We analyzed DpR by central review of computer tomography images (change from baseline to smallest tumor diameter), early tumor shrinkage (≥ 20% reduction in tumor diameter at first reassessment), time to DpR (study randomization to DpR-image), post-DpR progression-free survival (pPFS = DpR-image to tumor progression or death), and post-DpR overall survival (pOS = DpR-image to death) with special focus on BRAF status in 66 patients and primary tumor site in 86 patients treated within the VOLFI-trial, respectively.

Results

: BRAF wild-type (BRAF-WT) compared to BRAF mutant (BRAF-MT) patients had greater DpR (− 57.6% vs. − 40.8%, p = 0.013) with a comparable time to DpR [4.0 (95% CI 3.1–4.4) vs. 3.9 (95% CI 2.5–5.5) months; p = 0.8852]. pPFS was 6.5 (95% CI 4.9–8.0) versus 2.6 (95% CI 1.2–4.0) months in favor of BRAF-WT patients (HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.11–0.53); p < 0.001). This transferred into a significant difference in pOS [33.6 (95% CI 26.0–41.3) vs. 5.4 (95% CI 5.0–5.9) months; HR 0.27 (95% CI 0.13–0.55); p < 0.001]. Similar observations were made for patients stratified for primary tumor site.

Conclusions

: BRAF-MT patients derive a less profound treatment response compared to BRAF-WT patients. The difference in outcome according to BRAF status is evident after achievement of DpR with BRAF-MT patients hardly deriving any further disease control beyond DpR. Our observations hint towards an aggressive tumor evolution in BRAF-MT tumors, which may already be molecularly detectable at the time of DpR.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Journal Volume
146
Journal Issue
10
Journal Page Range
p. 2681-2691
ISSN
0171-5216
CODEN
JCROD7

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 © The Author(s) 2020