Published July 28, 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

The sensitivity of gamma-index method to the positioning errors of high-definition MLC in patient-specific VMAT QA for SBRT

  • 1. Center for Convergence Research on Robotics, Advance Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 3. Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 5. Interdiciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 7. Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)

Description

To investigate the sensitivity of various gamma criteria used in the gamma-index method for patient-specific volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) quality assurance (QA) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using a flattening filter free (FFF) photon beam. Three types of intentional misalignments were introduced to original high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD-MLC) plans. The first type, referred to Class Out, involved the opening of each bank of leaves. The second type, Class In, involved the closing of each bank of leaves. The third type, Class Shift, involved the shifting of each bank of leaves towards the ground. Patient-specific QAs for the original and the modified plans were performed with MapCHECK2 and EBT2 films. The sensitivity of the gamma-index method using criteria of 1%/1 mm, 1.5%/1.5 mm, 1%/2 mm, 2%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm was investigated with absolute passing rates according to the magnitudes of MLCs misalignments. In addition, the changes in dose-volumetric indicators due to the magnitudes of MLC misalignments were investigated. The correlations between passing rates and the changes in dose-volumetric indicators were also investigated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (γ). The criterion of 2%/1 mm was able to detect Class Out and Class In MLC misalignments of 0.5 mm and Class Shift misalignments of 1 mm. The widely adopted clinical criterion of 2%/2 mm was not able to detect 0.5 mm MLC errors of the Class Out or Class In types, and also unable to detect 3 mm Class Shift errors. No correlations were observed between dose-volumetric changes and gamma passing rates (γ < 0.8). Gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm was found to be suitable as a tolerance level with passing rates of 90% and 80% for patient-specific VMAT QA for SBRT when using MapCHECK2 and EBT2 film, respectively

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-167; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118611

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Oncology (Online)
Journal Volume
9
Journal Page Range
p. 167
ISSN
1748-717X

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47066111
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS; CORRELATIONS; ERRORS; FILM DOSIMETRY; INDICATORS; PATIENTS; PHOTON BEAMS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY; SENSITIVITY
Descriptors DEC
BEAMS; BUILDINGS; DOSIMETRY; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Kim et al.
Notes
PMCID: PMC4118611; PUBLISHER-ID: 1748-717X-9-167; PMID: 25070065; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4118611; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.