Published June 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Resilience analytics with disruption of preferences and lifecycle cost analysis for energy microgrids

  • 1. Department of Systems & Information Engineering, University of Virginia, 151 Engineer's Way, P.O. Box 400747, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4747 (United States)
  • 2. School of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University of Oklahoma, 202 W. Boyd St., Room 124, Norman, OK 73019-1022 (United States)

Description

Innovative technologies are presenting opportunities to improve resilience of energy plans for industrial and military installations. The investment rationale is complicated by uncertain future conditions across the system lifecycle, including technology, climate, economy, and others. This paper introduces resilience analytics with scenario-based preferences as follows. Risk is addressed here as the degree of disruption of priorities for investments in engineering systems. The particular concern of this paper is disruption from shifts in public values, and to evaluate the resilience of investment plans to such shifts. It recognizes resilience models as compilations of instantaneous framings of initiatives, objectives, stakeholder preferences, and uncertainties. Problem frames can be considered in series, where inputs to frames are the outputs of previous frames. Or frames can be considered in parallel, featuring joint inputs while addressing differing questions. This paper presents a case study of resilience analytics focusing on two quantitative frames. In the first frame, scenario-based preferences are used to identify combinations of factors disruptive to energy innovation at installations. In the second frame, estimation of lifecycle costs is performed with respect to factors that were identified as influential in the previous frame. - Highlights: • Develops method for resilience analytics of system plans with deep uncertainties. • Describes economic, regulatory, environmental, technology, and other stressors. • Demonstrates that stressors disrupt the prioritization of microgrid initiatives. • Describes how overlapping model frames emphasize various aspects of the mission. • Presents a two-part demonstration: Initiatives prioritization and lifecycle costs.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.005

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.005;
PII
S0951-8320(16)00014-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Journal Volume
150
Journal Page Range
p. 11-21
ISSN
0951-8320
CODEN
RESSEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
48005048
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
ENGINEERING; HAZARDS; INSTALLATION; INVESTMENT; LIFE-CYCLE COST; PLANNING; SMART GRIDS
Descriptors DEC
COST; ENERGY SYSTEMS; POWER SYSTEMS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.