Published July 1982 | Version v1
Journal article

The naked experts

Creators

  • 1. Australian National Univ., Canberra. Dept. of Mathematics

Description

In an article critical of experts, the cases argued for and against nuclear power are discussed under the headings: environmental hazards arising from the nuclear fuel cycle; proliferation of nuclear weapons capabilities via expansion of the nuclear power industry; political and social threats and restraints of a nuclear society (terrorism, reduction in civil liberties, centralised political and economic power); economic and employment disadvantages of nuclear power; impact of uranium mining on (Australian) aboriginal culture; inadequacy of nuclear power as a solution to energy problems; advantages of a 'soft energy path' based around conservation and renewable energy technologies. (U.K.)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Ecologist (London)
Journal Volume
12
Journal Issue
4
Series
Ecologist (London).
Journal Page Range
149-157
ISSN
0012-9631

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
United Kingdom
INIS RN
14717376
Subject category
S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
Descriptors DEI
ECONOMICS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; HAZARDS; NUCLEAR POWER; OCCUPATIONS; POLITICAL ASPECTS; PROLIFERATION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; RURAL POPULATIONS; SOCIOLOGY; URANIUM MINES
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY SOURCES; HUMAN POPULATIONS; MINES; POPULATIONS; POWER