Published July 1982
| Version v1
Journal article
The naked experts
Description
In an article critical of experts, the cases argued for and against nuclear power are discussed under the headings: environmental hazards arising from the nuclear fuel cycle; proliferation of nuclear weapons capabilities via expansion of the nuclear power industry; political and social threats and restraints of a nuclear society (terrorism, reduction in civil liberties, centralised political and economic power); economic and employment disadvantages of nuclear power; impact of uranium mining on (Australian) aboriginal culture; inadequacy of nuclear power as a solution to energy problems; advantages of a 'soft energy path' based around conservation and renewable energy technologies. (U.K.)
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Ecologist (London)
- Journal Volume
- 12
- Journal Issue
- 4
- Series
- Ecologist (London).
- Journal Page Range
- 149-157
- ISSN
- 0012-9631
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- United Kingdom
- INIS RN
- 14717376
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ECONOMICS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; HAZARDS; NUCLEAR POWER; OCCUPATIONS; POLITICAL ASPECTS; PROLIFERATION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; RURAL POPULATIONS; SOCIOLOGY; URANIUM MINES
- Descriptors DEC
- ENERGY SOURCES; HUMAN POPULATIONS; MINES; POPULATIONS; POWER