Published March 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • 1. Department of Engineering and Management of Energy Resources, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani (Greece)

Description

Complexity of power plant evaluation is steadily rising, as more criteria are involved in the overall assessment while evaluation data change rapidly. Apart from evaluating several aspects of power plants separately, a multicriteria analysis based on hierarchically structured criteria is necessary, so as to address the overall assessment of power plants according to the technological, economic and sustainability aspects. For this reason, in this paper, ten types of power plant are evaluated using nine end node criteria properly structured under the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Moreover, pairwise comparisons allow for accurate subjective criteria weighting. According to the scenario based on the subjective criteria weighting, emphasis is laid on sustainability driving renewable energy power plants at the top of the overall ranking, while nuclear and fossil fuel power plants rank in the last five positions. End node criteria contribution to each power plant and power plant performance per end node criterion is presented for all types of power plant and end node criteria

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.009

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.009;
PII
S0301-4215(08)00588-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
37
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 778-787
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
40081728
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; ECONOMICS; FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS; PERFORMANCE; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY SOURCES; EVALUATION; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.