Published January 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Simulation-based performance evaluation of model predictive control for building energy systems

  • 1. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352 (United States)
  • 2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • Evaluated performance of model predictive control for building energy management. • Investigated combined impacts of model and control intervals on control performance. • Provided useful insights on selection of model and control intervals in practice. The performance of model predictive control can be significantly affected by different choices of controller parameters such as the time intervals for model discretization and control sampling. Due to the lack of a systematic understanding on how these parameters affect the control performance, they are usually selected arbitrarily in practice. In this paper, the combined impacts of selected time intervals for model discretization and control sampling on the performance of model predictive control are comprehensively investigated for the first time through detailed simulations. The simulation results reveal that the time interval for model discretization has a much greater influence on the performance of model predictive control than that for control sampling by affecting the prediction performance, cost saving, and computation time simultaneously. In particular, there are three findings on the time interval for model discretization that are specific to the case studies considered herein. First, it affects the performance of multi-period prediction in a non-linear manner so that it is not always better to have a smaller time interval for model discretization. Second, it has four times greater influence on the resulting cost saving from model predictive control than the time interval for control sampling. Last, it affects the computation time significantly. The increase of the time interval for model discretization from 1 min to 5 min can reduce the computation time by roughly 96%. The proposed simulation-based performance evaluation sheds light on the importance of selecting appropriate time intervals for practical applications of model predictive control to building energy management.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116027

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116027;
PII
S0306261920314677;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Energy
Journal Volume
281
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0306-2619
CODEN
APENDX

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53107163
Subject category
S97: MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND COMPUTING; S32: ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION;
Descriptors DEI
BUILDINGS; CALCULATION METHODS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; ENERGY SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; SAMPLING
Descriptors DEC
MANAGEMENT; SIMULATION

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.