Published February 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

The U.S. coal sector between shale gas and renewables: Last resort coal exports?

  • 1. Dept. Energy, Transport, Environment, German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), Mohrenstr. 58, 10115, Berlin (Germany)
  • 2. Workgroup for Economic and Infrastructure Policy, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin (Germany)
  • 3. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NTNU Energy Transition Initiative (NETI), 7491, Trondheim (Norway)

Description

Highlights: • Observed rate of U.S. coal sector decline has exceeded many model scenarios. • Taking into account power plant lifetime rapidly continues downward trend of coal. • Ambitious global climate policy would make U.S. coal sector collapse in the 2030s. • West Coast exports could delay U.S. coal sector decline but is an uncertain strategy. • Low-cost, high-productivity Powder River Basin also has substantial decline risk. Coal consumption and production have sharply declined in recent years in the U.S., despite political support. Reasons are mostly unfavorable economic conditions for coal, including competition from natural gas and renewables in the power sector, as well as an aging coal-fired power plant fleet. Nevertheless, coal remains a major energy source in the North American energy markets. Supplementing EMF34 energy system analyses, we take a sectoral perspective to analyze coal's future role in this context. The U.S. Energy Information Administration as well as most models in EMF34 depict continuously high shares of coal-fired power generation over the next decades in their current policy scenarios. We contrast their results with coal sector modelling based on bottom-up data and recent market trends. We project considerably lower near-term coal use for power generation in the U.S. This has significant effects on regional coal production. Allowing new export terminals along the U.S. West Coast could ease cuts in U.S. production. Yet, exports are a highly uncertain strategy because the U.S. could be strongly affected by changes in global demand, for example from non-U.S. climate policy.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112097

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112097;
PII
S0301421520308089;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
149
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.