Published 1993 | Version v1
Journal article

The tyranny of K equals 1

  • 1. Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States)

Description

Considerations of nuclear safety generally conclude with the evaluation of keff. When k is < 1, the system is considered safe, and when k is <1, it is considered catastrophic. Kinetics evaluations are most often conducted without consideration of the mechanics and rate for the introduction of the additional reactivity. In reality, the energy release from a system in which reactivity is added slowly may be protracted over such a long period of time as to be inconsequential. In fact, if the rate of reactivity addition is sufficiently low, it is possible that k will never reach 1. Nevertheless, accident analyses that fail to include all aspects of kinetics are alarming and can lead to the requirement of additional analyses and costly, unnecessary mitigation features

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Transactions of the American Nuclear Society
Journal Volume
69
Journal Page Range
p. 246.
ISSN
0003-018X
CODEN
TANSAO

Conference

Title
American Nuclear Society (ANS) winter meeting.
Dates
14-18 Nov 1993.
Place
San Francisco, CA (United States).

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
26025717
Subject category
S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
CRITICALITY; MULTIPLICATION FACTORS; REACTIVITY INSERTIONS; REACTOR KINETICS; REACTOR SAFETY
Descriptors DEC
KINETICS; SAFETY

Optional Information

Secondary number(s)
CONF-931160--.