Published June 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

SU-F-T-494: A Multi-Institutional Study of Independent Dose Verification Using Golden Beam Data

  • 1. Inagi Municipal Hospital, Inagi, Tokyo (Japan)
  • 2. National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba (Japan)
  • 3. Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo (Japan)
  • 4. Kitasato University Medical Center, Kitamoto, Saitama (Japan)
  • 5. National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo (Japan)
  • 6. Cancer Institute Hospital Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto, Tokyo (Japan)
  • 7. Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto, Tokyo (Japan)
  • 8. Sasebo City General Hospital, Sasebo, Nagasaki (Japan)
  • 9. National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Chiba (Japan)

Description

Purpose: In general, beam data of individual linac is measured for independent dose verification software program and the verification is performed as a secondary check. In this study, independent dose verification using golden beam data was compared to that using individual linac's beam data. Methods: Six institutions were participated and three different beam data were prepared. The one was individual measured data (Original Beam Data, OBD) .The others were generated by all measurements from same linac model (Model-GBD) and all linac models (All-GBD). The three different beam data were registered to the independent verification software program for each institute. Subsequently, patient's plans in eight sites (brain, head and neck, lung, esophagus, breast, abdomen, pelvis and bone) were analyzed using the verification program to compare doses calculated using the three different beam data. Results: 1116 plans were collected from six institutes. Compared to using the OBD, the results shows the variation using the Model-GBD based calculation and the All-GBD was 0.0 ± 0.3% and 0.0 ± 0.6%, respectively. The maximum variations were 1.2% and 2.3%, respectively. The plans with the variation over 1% shows the reference points were located away from the central axis with/without physical wedge. Conclusion: The confidence limit (2SD) using the Model-GBD and the All-GBD was within 0.6% and 1.2%, respectively. Thus, the use of golden beam data may be feasible for independent verification. In addition to it, the verification using golden beam data provide quality assurance of planning from the view of audit. This research is partially supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development(AMED)

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Medical Physics
Journal Volume
43
Journal Issue
6
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0094-2405
CODEN
MPHYA6

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
48097739
Subject category
S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES; S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
Descriptors DEI
BEAMS; COMPUTER CODES; DOSES; LINEAR ACCELERATORS; MAMMARY GLANDS; PLANNING; QUALITY ASSURANCE; VARIATIONS; VERIFICATION
Descriptors DEC
ACCELERATORS; BODY; GLANDS; ORGANS

Optional Information

Notes
(c) 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine