Published January 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

A single-gradient junction technique to replace multiple-junction shifts for craniospinal irradiation treatment

Description

Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) requires abutting fields at the cervical spine. Junction shifts are conventionally used to prevent setup error–induced overdosage/underdosage from occurring at the same location. This study compared the dosimetric differences at the cranial-spinal junction between a single-gradient junction technique and conventional multiple-junction shifts and evaluated the effect of setup errors on the dose distributions between both techniques for a treatment course and single fraction. Conventionally, 2 lateral brain fields and a posterior spine field(s) are used for CSI with weekly 1-cm junction shifts. We retrospectively replanned 4 CSI patients using a single-gradient junction between the lateral brain fields and the posterior spine field. The fields were extended to allow a minimum 3-cm field overlap. The dose gradient at the junction was achieved using dose painting and intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning. The effect of positioning setup errors on the dose distributions for both techniques was simulated by applying shifts of ± 3 and 5 mm. The resulting cervical spine doses across the field junction for both techniques were calculated and compared. Dose profiles were obtained for both a single fraction and entire treatment course to include the effects of the conventional weekly junction shifts. Compared with the conventional technique, the gradient-dose technique resulted in higher dose uniformity and conformity to the target volumes, lower organ at risk (OAR) mean and maximum doses, and diminished hot spots from systematic positioning errors over the course of treatment. Single-fraction hot and cold spots were improved for the gradient-dose technique. The single-gradient junction technique provides improved conformity, dose uniformity, diminished hot spots, lower OAR mean and maximum dose, and one plan for the entire treatment course, which reduces the potential human error associated with conventional 4-shifted plans

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2014.05.004

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.meddos.2014.05.004;
PII
S0958-3947(14)00063-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Medical Dosimetry
Journal Volume
39
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 314-319
ISSN
0958-3947

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46126760
Subject category
S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
Descriptors DEI
BRAIN; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; ERRORS; HOT SPOTS; IRRADIATION; PATIENTS; PLANNING; POSITIONING; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY; VERTEBRAE
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DOSES; EVALUATION; MEDICINE; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; SKELETON; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.