Liquid metal MHD studies with non-magnetic and ferro-magnetic structural material
Creators
- 1. Institute of Plasma Research, Gandhinagar 382428, Gujarat (India)
- 2. Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Mumbai 400085, Maharashtra (India)
- 3. Institute of Physics, University of Latvia, Salaspils 2169 (Latvia)
Description
Highlights: • Effect of structural material on liquid metal MHD phenomena is studied. • Two identical test sections, one made of SS316L (non-magnetic) and other made of SS430 (ferromagnetic) structural material, are considered. • Wall electric potential and liquid metal pressure drop are compared under various experimental conditions. • Experimental results suggest screening of external magnetic field for SS430 material below the saturation magnetic field. - Abstract: In most of the liquid metal MHD experiments reported in the literature to study liquid breeder blanket performance, SS316/SS304 grade steels are used as the structural material which is non-magnetic. On the other hand, the structural material for fusion blanket systems has been proposed to be ferritic martensitic grade steel (FMS) which is ferromagnetic in nature. In the recent experimental campaign, liquid metal MHD experiments have been carried out with two identical test sections: one made of SS316L (non-magnetic) and another with SS430 (ferromagnetic), to compare the effect of structural materials on MHD phenomena for various magnetic fields (up to 4 T). The maximum Hartmann number and interaction number are 1047 and 300, respectively. Each test section consists of square channel (25 mm × 25 mm) cross-section with two U bends, with inlet and outlet at the middle portion of two horizontal legs, respectively. Pb–Li enters into the test section through a square duct and distributed into two parallel paths through a partition plate. In each parallel path, it travels ∼0.28 m length in plane perpendicular to the magnetic field and faces two 90° bends before coming out of the test section through a single square duct. The wall electrical potential and MHD pressure drop across the test sections are compared under identical experimental conditions. Similar MHD behavior is observed with both the test section at higher value of the magnetic field (>2 T)
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.02.003Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.02.003;
- PII
- S0920-3796(14)00087-8;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Fusion Engineering and Design
- Journal Volume
- 89
- Journal Issue
- 7-8
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1356-1361
- ISSN
- 0920-3796
- CODEN
- FEDEEE
Conference
- Title
- 11. international symposium on fusion nuclear technology
- Acronym
- ISFNT-11
- Dates
- 15-20 Sep 2013
- Place
- Barcelona (Spain)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 46090611
- Subject category
- S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- BREEDING BLANKETS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; FERRITIC STEELS; HARTMANN NUMBER; LIQUID METALS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; MARTENSITIC STEELS; PRESSURE DROP; STAINLESS STEELS; THERMONUCLEAR REACTOR MATERIALS; THERMONUCLEAR REACTORS
- Descriptors DEC
- ALLOYS; CARBON ADDITIONS; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; ELEMENTS; EVALUATION; FLUID MECHANICS; FLUIDS; HIGH ALLOY STEELS; HYDRODYNAMICS; IRON ALLOYS; IRON BASE ALLOYS; LIQUIDS; MATERIALS; MECHANICS; METALS; REACTOR COMPONENTS; STEELS; TRANSITION ELEMENT ALLOYS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.