ESR/ERS white paper on lung cancer screening
Creators
- 1. Member of the German Lung Research Center, Translational Lung Research Center, Heidelberg (Germany)
- 2. University Hospital Heidelberg, Dept of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg (Germany)
- 3. A. Gemelli University Hospital, Institute of Radiology, Rome (Italy)
- 4. Athens Chest Hospital, 7th Resp. Med. Dept and Asthma Center, Athens (Greece)
- 5. KU Leuven-University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Respiratory Diseases/Respiratory Oncology Unit, Leuven (Belgium)
- 6. Tel Aviv University, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv (Israel)
- 7. Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Nijmegen (Netherlands)
- 8. Department of Thoracic Imaging, Hospital Calmette (EA 2694), CHRU et Universite de Lille, Lille (France)
- 9. Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Thoracic oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels (Belgium)
Description
Lung cancer is the most frequently fatal cancer, with poor survival once the disease is advanced. Annual low-dose computed tomography has shown a survival benefit in screening individuals at high risk for lung cancer. Based on the available evidence, the European Society of Radiology and the European Respiratory Society recommend lung cancer screening in comprehensive, quality-assured, longitudinal programmes within a clinical trial or in routine clinical practice at certified multidisciplinary medical centres. Minimum requirements include: standardised operating procedures for low-dose image acquisition, computer-assisted nodule evaluation, and positive screening results and their management; inclusion/exclusion criteria; expectation management; and smoking cessation programmes. Further refinements are recommended to increase quality, outcome and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening: inclusion of risk models, reduction of effective radiation dose, computer-assisted volumetric measurements and assessment of comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and vascular calcification). All these requirements should be adjusted to the regional infrastructure and healthcare system, in order to exactly define eligibility using a risk model, nodule management and a quality assurance plan. The establishment of a central registry, including a biobank and an image bank, and preferably on a European level, is strongly encouraged. (orig.)
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3697-0Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 25
- Journal Issue
- 9
- Journal Page Range
- p. 2519-2531
- ISSN
- 0938-7994
- CODEN
- EURAE3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 46116840
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ALGORITHMS; CARCINOMAS; CLINICAL TRIALS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ERRORS; IMAGE PROCESSING; LUNGS; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RADIATION DOSES; RECOMMENDATIONS; SCREENING; STANDARDIZATION; SURVIVAL CURVES; SURVIVAL TIME; TOBACCO SMOKES
- Descriptors DEC
- AEROSOLS; BODY; COLLOIDS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; DISPERSIONS; DOSES; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; ORGANS; PROCESSING; RESIDUES; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; SMOKES; SOLS; TESTING; TOMOGRAPHY