Published September 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

ESR/ERS white paper on lung cancer screening

  • 1. Member of the German Lung Research Center, Translational Lung Research Center, Heidelberg (Germany)
  • 2. University Hospital Heidelberg, Dept of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg (Germany)
  • 3. A. Gemelli University Hospital, Institute of Radiology, Rome (Italy)
  • 4. Athens Chest Hospital, 7th Resp. Med. Dept and Asthma Center, Athens (Greece)
  • 5. KU Leuven-University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Respiratory Diseases/Respiratory Oncology Unit, Leuven (Belgium)
  • 6. Tel Aviv University, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv (Israel)
  • 7. Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Nijmegen (Netherlands)
  • 8. Department of Thoracic Imaging, Hospital Calmette (EA 2694), CHRU et Universite de Lille, Lille (France)
  • 9. Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Thoracic oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels (Belgium)

Description

Lung cancer is the most frequently fatal cancer, with poor survival once the disease is advanced. Annual low-dose computed tomography has shown a survival benefit in screening individuals at high risk for lung cancer. Based on the available evidence, the European Society of Radiology and the European Respiratory Society recommend lung cancer screening in comprehensive, quality-assured, longitudinal programmes within a clinical trial or in routine clinical practice at certified multidisciplinary medical centres. Minimum requirements include: standardised operating procedures for low-dose image acquisition, computer-assisted nodule evaluation, and positive screening results and their management; inclusion/exclusion criteria; expectation management; and smoking cessation programmes. Further refinements are recommended to increase quality, outcome and cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening: inclusion of risk models, reduction of effective radiation dose, computer-assisted volumetric measurements and assessment of comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and vascular calcification). All these requirements should be adjusted to the regional infrastructure and healthcare system, in order to exactly define eligibility using a risk model, nodule management and a quality assurance plan. The establishment of a central registry, including a biobank and an image bank, and preferably on a European level, is strongly encouraged. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3697-0

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
25
Journal Issue
9
Journal Page Range
p. 2519-2531
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3