The Contribution of Perturbation Coil Geometry Induced Sidebands and MHD Response in KSTAR and DIII-D
- 1. University of California San Diego, CA 92093 (United States)
- 2. General Atomics, San Diego, CA 92186 (United States)
- 3. Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (United States)
- 4. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ 08540 (United States)
- 5. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139 (United States)
- 6. National Fusion Research Institute (NFRI), Daejeon (Korea, Republic of)
Description
Full text: In this work we show that the application of a square wave n = 1 toroidal perturbation on DIII-D and KSTAR leads to significant n = 3 toroidal sidebands. In the vacuum model, these n = 3 sidebands assist in creation of wide stochastic field in the edge of the plasma. In KSTAR, the n = 3 sideband fields create vacuum islands in the right places to extend the vacuum island overlap width to more than 25%. We have also shown that these n = 3 sidebands are screened less by the plasma response, and the rational surface resonant fields are of similar size with the main n = 1 fields in KSTAR. The effect of these sidebands in the RMP ELM suppression should be studied more carefully both experimentally and numerically as these sidebands may play an important role. Recent studies on DIII-D have shown that RMP ELM suppression may be achieved with a reduced number of RMP coils and less total injected magnetic flux due to the increasing role of toroidal sidebands. Application of square wave n = 4 and discretized cosine n = 3 waveforms in ITER RMP coils has also shown some advantages of square wave waveforms as they are naturally capable to generate multiple toroidal sidebands. The modelling results suggest the importance of self-consistent, nonlinear modelling of the plasma response including the full toroidal mode spectrum that is applied, since interactions among the toroidal sidebands may be important. These results also provide a hypothesis for why RMP ELM suppression with an n = 1 spectrum has been more difficult to achieve in DIII-D than either n = 2 and n = 3, since the kink-driven screening of the applied RMP field is more complete at n = 1 than n = 2 or 3. Finally, the direct implication for ELM suppression in ITER is that the number of coils (and hence larger toroidal mode number) should be preserved to maintain the highest margin for success. (author)
Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Imprint Title
- 26. IAEA Fusion Energy Conference. Programme, Abstracts and Conference Material
- Imprint Pagination
- 935 p.
- Journal Page Range
- p. 222
- Report number
- IAEA-CN--234
Conference
- Title
- 26. IAEA Fusion Energy Conference
- Acronym
- FEC 2016
- Dates
- 17-22 Oct 2016
- Place
- Kyoto (Japan)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 49089391
- Subject category
- S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- DISTURBANCES; DOUBLET-3 DEVICE; EDGE LOCALIZED MODES; ELECTRIC COILS; ITER TOKAMAK; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; MODE RATIONAL SURFACES; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS; PLASMA; PLASMA SIMULATION; SCREENING; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; WAVE FORMS
- Descriptors DEC
- CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT; FLUID MECHANICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; INSTABILITY; MAGNETIC FIELD CONFIGURATIONS; MAGNETIC SURFACES; MECHANICS; PLASMA INSTABILITY; PLASMA MACROINSTABILITIES; SIMULATION; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES; THERMONUCLEAR REACTORS; TOKAMAK DEVICES; TOKAMAK TYPE REACTORS
Optional Information
- Notes
- Abstract only; 2 refs.
- Secondary number(s)
- IAEA-CN--234-0536