Published May 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Residual analysis of the equilibrium reconstruction quality on JET

  • 1. Consorzio RFX-Associazione EURATOM ENEA per la Fusione, I-35127 Padova (Italy)
  • 2. Association EURATOM-CEA, CEA Cadarache, 13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance (France)
  • 3. Associazione EURATOM-ENEA-University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Roma (Italy)
  • 4. Ecole Centrale de Nantes Engineering College, 44000 Nantes (France)
  • 5. Arts et Metiers Paris Tech Engineering College (ENSAM), 13100 Aix-en-Provence (France)

Description

An extended set of statistical tests, aimed at assessing the quality of the magnetic reconstructions in JET, obtained with the code EFIT using the external magnetic measurements, is described and the results reported in detail. In addition to the traditional analysis of the global distributions of the residuals (the difference between the actual measurements and their reconstructions from the equilibrium), to determine to what extent they approximate a Gaussian, more sophisticated correlation tests have been performed. Since EFIT solves a highly non-linear equation, tests adequate for multi-input multi-output, non-linear systems have been implemented. Not only the reconstruction of the pickup coil signals but also the accuracy of the plasma boundary has been investigated. The results indicate quite clearly that the errors in the reconstruction of the pickup coils are not negligible. The coils, whose residuals present skewed monomodal distributions (distributions asymmetric with respect to their maximum value), are affected by average errors of the order of more than one millitesla and multimodal distributions of the residuals (distributions presenting more than one local maximum) are quite common. Also the correlation of the residuals is typically outside the 95% limits for a good model in typically more than 70% of the cases. With regard to the plasma boundary, the situation is better since the errors in the distances of the plasma from the wall are typically of the order of 1 cm. On the other hand, in this case the autocorrelations of the residuals are also well outside the 95% confidence interval for random residuals. A detailed analysis of the correlations indicates that the main reasons for the imperfections in the magnetic reconstructions do not reside in the measurements, since there is no evidence of systematic errors or problems with the calibrations. Therefore, the main improvements are to be expected by refinements in the used equilibrium code EFIT, whose constraints and boundary conditions are probably not the most appropriate to model H mode plasmas.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/51/5/053012

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1088/0029-5515/51/5/053012;
PII
S0029-5515(11)73363-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Fusion
Journal Volume
51
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
[18 p.]
ISSN
0029-5515
CODEN
NUFUAU

INIS

Country of Publication
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
43006431
Subject category
S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
Descriptors DEI
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CORRELATIONS; EQUILIBRIUM; ERRORS; JET TOKAMAK; PLASMA
Descriptors DEC
CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES; TOKAMAK DEVICES

Optional Information

Collaborations
JET-EFDA Contributors