Published January 27, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Correlating Whole-Body Bone Mineral Densitometry Measurements to Those From Local Anatomical Sites

  • 1. Department of Rheumatology, Loghman e Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
  • 2. Department of Imaging, Research Development Center, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
  • 3. Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
  • 4. Clinical Research and Development Center, Imam Hossein Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran (Iran, Islamic Republic of)

Description

Using the same cutoff points for whole-body measurements as for site-specific measurements will result in underestimation of osteoporosis. We assessed the correlation between densitometry measurements for the whole body with those for the femur, lumbar spine, and forearm to evaluate the possibility of replacing site-specific values with whole-body measurements. In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated all patients referred to a single rheumatology clinic for bone mineral density measurements from 2009 to 2010. All patients who had bone mineral density measurements taken from the hip, lumbar spine, forearm, and whole body were enrolled in the study. Standard bone mineral density measurements were performed using a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry device (Hologic Delphi A; Hologic, Bedford, MA, USA). Bone mineral density, Z-score, and T-score were measured for all patients and all body regions. The mean age of the 152 participating patients was 56.7 ± 12.6 years, and 97.4% were female. Pearson correlation coefficients of the whole-body bone mineral density values compared with site-specific values in patients over age 50 were 0.66 – 0.75. Using T-score cutoff points of -1 and -2.5 for osteopenia and osteoporosis, whole-body measurements underestimated the percentage of abnormal patients compared with the site-specific measurements (all P < 0.001). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the whole-body bone mineral density showed respective areas under the curve of 0.96 and 0.84 for the diagnosis of abnormal hip bone mineral density and osteoporosis. Using the same cutoff points for whole-body measurements as for site-specific measurements will result in overestimation or especially underestimation of osteopenia and osteoporosis diagnosis. Choosing new and appropriate cutoff points for whole-body densitometric measurements when we want to substitutes this assessment instead of site specific measurements seems mandatory and will decrease the rate of false diagnoses of densitometric deficiencies in these anatomical sites

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.25609; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4841932

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Iranian Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
13
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
1735-1065

INIS

Country of Publication
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47089533
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; BONE MINERAL DENSITY; DIAGNOSIS; FEMUR; OSTEOPOROSIS; PATIENTS; X RADIATION
Descriptors DEC
BODY; BODY COMPOSITION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; IONIZING RADIATIONS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIATIONS; RADIOLOGY; SKELETAL DISEASES; SKELETON

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology.
Notes
PMCID: PMC4841932; PMID: 27127575; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4841932