There is a newer version of the record available.

Published April 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

To burn or retain crop residues on croplands? An integrated analysis of crop residue management in China

  • 1. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR (China)
  • 2. Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, PR (China)
  • 3. School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, PR (China)
  • 4. National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR (China)
  • 5. School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR (China)
  • 6. Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovak Republic (Czech Republic)
  • 7. Center for Landscape Resilience & Management (CLR), Ecosystem Services and Management Program ESM, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg (Austria)

Description

Highlights: • Farmers in China burn almost 1/4 of crop residues, causing environmental damages. • Simulations and economic analyses combined to assess a shift in residue management. • Residue retention avoided CO2 emission by 150 Tg yr−1 and increased SOC sequestration by 24 Tg C yr−1. • Required incentives vary regionally; Northeast China required the lowest. • Existing subsidies (150–600 CNY ha−1) are lower than the incentives required (287–836 CNY ha−1) to make a shift. -- Abstract: Crop residue burning influences human health and global climate change. In China—the world's largest crop residue producer—farmers burn almost one quarter of their crop residues in the field after harvest, despite the government providing financial incentives such as subsidies to retain crop residues. This study combined economic analyses with simulations of soil carbon accumulation and carbon emission reduction associated with different residue management practices to determine the minimum level of incentives needed for Chinese farmers to shift from burning to retaining crop residues for generating carbon benefits. Simulation results showed that [1] the density of topsoil organic carbon in China's croplands would have increased from about 21.8 t ha−1 in 2000 to 23.9 t ha−1 in 2010, and soil organic carbon sequestration would have reached 24.4 Tg C yr−1 if farmers had shifted from burning to retaining crop residues on croplands during this period; and [2] retaining crop residues would have avoided about 149.9 Tg of CO2 emission per year. Economic analyses showed that [1] existing subsidies in all regions of China, except Northeast China, only accounted for 18–82% of the incentives required for farmers to shift from burning to crop residue retention; [2] Northeast China required the lowest incentive (287 CNY ha−1), while eastern China required the highest (837 CNY ha−1); and [3] the prevailing market prices (1.4–60.2 CNY tCO2e−1) in China's seven pilot carbon markets seem to be below the required incentives (39.6–189.1 CNY tCO2e−1). Our study suggests that the Chinese government should increase subsidies or seek innovative incentive schemes to encourage farmers to change their crop residue management practices for global climate change mitigation and health benefits.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.150;
PII
S0048969719301676;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
662
Journal Page Range
p. 141-150
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.