Published July 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparing different methods for radioactive iodine fixation intended for brachytherapy sources manufacture

Description

Highlights: •Prostate cancer is the sixth most common type in the world. •This study compares 3 deposition methods of radioactive Iodine on silver substrate. •method 1 (test based on electrodeposition method) presented a 65.16% efficiency. •method 2 (chemical reaction) with 70.80% efficiency. •method 3 (IPEN's chemical reaction) which presented efficiency of 55.80%. -- Abstract: Brachytherapy, a method of radiotherapy, is being extensively used in the early and intermediate stages of the illness. In this treatment, radioactive seeds are placed inside or next to the area requiring treatment, which reduces the probability of unnecessary damage to surrounding healthy tissues. Currently, the radioactive isotope iodine-125, fixated on silver substrate, is one of the most used in prostate brachytherapy. The present study compares several deposition methods of radioactive iodine on silver substrate, in order to choose the most suitable one to be implemented at the laboratory of radioactive sources production of IPEN. Three methods were selected: method 1 (test based on electrodeposition method, developed by David Kubiatowicz) which presented efficiency of 65.16%; method 2 (chemical reaction based on the method developed by David Kubiatowicz - HCl) which presented efficiency of 70.80%; method 3 (chemical reaction based on the method developed by Dr. Maria Elisa Rostelato) which presented efficiency of 55.80%. Based on the results, the second method is the suggested one to be implemented at the laboratory of radioactive sources production of IPEN.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.03.013

Additional details

Additional titles

Augmented title (English)
Cancer;Prostate;Brachytherapy;Iodine-125

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.03.013;
PII
S0149197016300580;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Journal Volume
90
Journal Page Range
p. 175-181
ISSN
0149-1970

Optional Information

Notes
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.