Published 1983 | Version v1
Book Open

Selection and evaluation of nuclear fuel cycle strategies. Technical and economic aspects

  • 1. UKAEA Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell

Description

The original choices of thermal reactors and fuel cycles were largely determined by specific national circumstances and by experience and facilities acquired from defence-related programmes. These led to the development of LWRs in the USA and to the natural uranium/gas/graphite system in the United Kingdom and France, while Canada selected the HWR. Most countries with nuclear power programmes saw the plutonium-fuelled fast reactor, with its breeding potential, as the means to ensure that exhaustion of economic uranium resources would not prematurely curtail the contribution of nuclear power to world energy supplies. Fuel reprocessing was essential to this fuel cycle or indeed to other recycling options to make better use of the available uranium; it was also favoured for waste management reasons. Early expectations of nuclear power growth suggested that a transition from thermal to fast reactors would occur during the present century but the urgency has been reduced by world economic recession, slower increases in nuclear capacity and the continued availability of supplies of low-priced uranium. Reprocessing costs have risen and economics of scale favour large plants, which are therefore most likely to be built in countries with substantial thermal reactor capacities; these countries will be able to provide reprocessing services to others. As the ultimate strategic need for fast reactors has not been reduced by this slowdown it is important to continue the development and demonstration of fast-reactor technology and the associated fuel cycles. Uncertainties in future fuel prices mean that it could be advantageous to introduce fast reactors as soon as they become an economic, although not necessarily the most economic, choice. Notably, fast reactors may be installed initially when and where they become economic compared to coal-fired generation, in order to lay the foundation for more rapid expansion when economic break-even with thermal reactors occurs. (author)

Files

14780391.pdf

Files (27.7 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7fc938a88d910e2a62f1b301acd0e6cc
27.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
IAEA.
Imprint Place
Vienna
ISBN
92-0-050283-0
Imprint Title
Nuclear power experience
Imprint Pagination
893 p.
Series
Proceedings series.
Journal Page Range
v. 3 p. 3-21.

Conference

Title
International conference on nuclear power experience.
Dates
13-17 Sep 1982.
Place
Vienna (Austria).

INIS

Country of Publication
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
14780391
Subject category
S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
AVAILABILITY; CAPACITY; FBR TYPE REACTORS; FORECASTING; FUEL CYCLE; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PLANNING; PLUTONIUM RECYCLE; POWER GENERATION; POWER REACTORS; PROLIFERATION; REPROCESSING; SPENT FUELS; THERMAL REACTORS; URANIUM
Descriptors DEC
ACTINIDES; BREEDER REACTORS; ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; EPITHERMAL REACTORS; FAST REACTORS; FUELS; MATERIALS; METALS; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; NUCLEAR FUELS; POWER PLANTS; REACTOR MATERIALS; REACTORS; SEPARATION PROCESSES; THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Optional Information

Secondary number(s)
IAEA-CN--42/20.