Published February 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Integral evaluation of granular activated carbon at four stages of a full-scale WWTP deodorization system

  • 1. Department of Inorganic Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Area of Chemical Engineering, University of Cordoba, Campus Universitario de Rabanales, Carretera N-IV, km 396, Edificio Marie Curie, 14071 Córdoba (Spain)
  • 2. Dpto. Química Inorgánica e Ingeniería Química, Instituto Universitario de Nanoquímica, Universidad de Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba (Spain)

Description

Highlights: • An integral evaluation of a WWTP deodorization system was carried out. • Two wastewater line and two sludge line GAC beds were used as sampling points. • Chemical and odor contribution of the retained gaseous families were compared. • Olfactometric and textural variables were successfully correlated. • Odor removal efficiency cannot be based solely on H2S quantification. Odor emissions from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have always been a public concern. In this work, the physico-chemical, olfactometric and textural characterization of granular active carbon (GAC) used by an urban WWTP as a deodorization system, as well as the chromatographic quantification of the retained odoriferous compounds, have been carried out. These techniques have allowed an integral evaluation of the contaminated GAC and the characterization of the retained gaseous emission from four different stages of the wastewater treatment (pretreatment header: GAC-1; sand and fat removal: GAC-2; sludge thickening: GAC-3; sludge dehydration: GAC-4). A larger amount and variety of retained odoriferous compounds were found in GAC samples from the wastewater line deodorization (GAC-1 and GAC-2) after the same operation time (one year), GAC-1 being the adsorbent bed that retained the highest mass of volatile compounds (approximately 150 μg/g GAC). Furthermore, some variables such as the removed specific odor concentration and free micropore volume were inversely correlated (R2 = 0.9945). The analysis of odor contribution showed that sulfur-containing compounds were the major odor contributors (61–97%). However, hydrogen sulfide cannot be considered a key odorant in this particular WWTP, since the elimination of this compound does not reduce the significant contribution of other (organic) sulfur compounds to the global odor (especially dimethyl disulfide). Consequently, multi-technical analysis might be a suitable alternative to better understand odor removal by GAC adsorption.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142237

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142237;
PII
S0048969720357661;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
754
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.