Published June 15, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

A multi-institution evaluation of deformable image registration algorithms for automatic organ delineation in adaptive head and neck radiotherapy

  • 1. Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW (Australia)
  • 2. Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1 A'Beckett St., Melbourne, VIC, 8006 (Australia)
  • 3. Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI (United States)
  • 4. Philips Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., Philips Innovation Campus, Bangalore (India)
  • 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg (Germany)
  • 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA (United States)
  • 7. Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Madison, WI (United States)
  • 8. Departments of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI (United States)
  • 9. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen (Netherlands)
  • 10. Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON (Canada)

Description

Adaptive Radiotherapy aims to identify anatomical deviations during a radiotherapy course and modify the treatment plan to maintain treatment objectives. This requires regions of interest (ROIs) to be defined using the most recent imaging data. This study investigates the clinical utility of using deformable image registration (DIR) to automatically propagate ROIs. Target (GTV) and organ-at-risk (OAR) ROIs were non-rigidly propagated from a planning CT scan to a per-treatment CT scan for 22 patients. Propagated ROIs were quantitatively compared with expert physician-drawn ROIs on the per-treatment scan using Dice scores and mean slicewise Hausdorff distances, and center of mass distances for GTVs. The propagated ROIs were qualitatively examined by experts and scored based on their clinical utility. Good agreement between the DIR-propagated ROIs and expert-drawn ROIs was observed based on the metrics used. 94% of all ROIs generated using DIR were scored as being clinically useful, requiring minimal or no edits. However, 27% (12/44) of the GTVs required major edits. DIR was successfully used on 22 patients to propagate target and OAR structures for ART with good anatomical agreement for OARs. It is recommended that propagated target structures be thoroughly reviewed by the treating physician

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-90; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3405479

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Oncology (Online)
Journal Volume
7
Journal Page Range
p. 90
ISSN
1748-717X

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47061886
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; CENTER-OF-MASS SYSTEM; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; HEAD; IMAGES; NECK; RADIOTHERAPY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c)2012 Hardcastle et al.
Notes
PMCID: PMC3405479; PUBLISHER-ID: 1748-717X-7-90; PMID: 22704464; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3405479; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.