Nuclear power and Sizewell debate
Description
The Secretary of State for Energy moved a motion welcoming the decision to give consent to the construction of the Sizewell-B PWR station. The advantages of nuclear energy, summarized in the motion, are in a diversity of energy supply including coal, gas, oil and nuclear power, the provision of cheap and efficient electricity afforded by nuclear generation and the employment it provides. An amendment to the motion provided the opportunity to hold a debate on the decision. The Secretary of State mentioned that very little opposition had arisen either from the Opposition parties in Parliament or from the public. The debate ranged over the nuclear policies of the Labour and Alliance opposition parties, the US nuclear power programme, the Soviet programme following Chernobyl, energy conservation and renewable energy sources, nuclear waste disposal, the economics and safety of the Sizewell B reactor. The debate which lasted about 2 1/2 hours is reported verbatim. The amendment was not approved, the main motion was passed, i.e. the House welcomed the decision to allow the Sizewell-B PWR to be built. (UK)
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Hansard. House Commons. Off. Rep.
- Journal Volume
- 116
- Journal Issue
- 105
- Series
- Hansard. House Commons. Off. Rep.
- Journal Page Range
- 81-124
- ISSN
- 0309-8826
- CODEN
- HAHCA
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- United Kingdom
- INIS RN
- 18074268
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY POLICY; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; HEARINGS; NUCLEAR POWER; PUBLIC OPINION; PWR TYPE REACTORS; SAFETY; SIZEWELL-B REACTOR; UNITED KINGDOM
- Descriptors DEC
- DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; EUROPE; POWER; POWER REACTORS; REACTORS; THERMAL REACTORS; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS