Published May 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Characterisation of ground motion recording stations in the Groningen gas field

  • 1. Deltares (Netherlands)
  • 2. Shell Global Solutions International B.V (Netherlands)
  • 3. University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg, Geotomographie GmbH Germany, now at School of Geosciences (South Africa)
  • 4. Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) (Netherlands)
  • 5. University of Liverpool, Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences (United Kingdom)
  • 6. Virginia Tech, Charles E Via, Jr., Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (United States)
  • 7. Imperial College London, Civil & Environmental Engineering (United Kingdom)
  • 8. Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V (Netherlands)

Description

The seismic hazard and risk analysis for the onshore Groningen gas field requires information about local soil properties, in particular shear-wave velocity (VS). A fieldwork campaign was conducted at 18 surface accelerograph stations of the monitoring network. The subsurface in the region consists of unconsolidated sediments and is heterogeneous in composition and properties. A range of different methods was applied to acquire in situ VS values to a target depth of at least 30 m. The techniques include seismic cone penetration tests (SCPT) with varying source offsets, multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) on Rayleigh waves with different processing approaches, microtremor array, cross-hole tomography and suspension P-S logging. The offset SCPT, cross-hole tomography and common midpoint cross-correlation (CMPcc) processing of MASW data all revealed lateral variations on length scales of several to tens of metres in this geological setting. SCPTs resulted in very detailed VS profiles with depth, but represent point measurements in a heterogeneous environment. The MASW results represent VS information on a larger spatial scale and smooth some of the heterogeneity encountered at the sites. The combination of MASW and SCPT proved to be a powerful and cost-effective approach in determining representative VS profiles at the accelerograph station sites. The measured VS profiles correspond well with the modelled profiles and they significantly enhance the ground motion model derivation. The similarity between the theoretical transfer function from the VS profile and the observed amplification from vertical array stations is also excellent.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Seismology
Journal Volume
22
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 605-623
ISSN
1383-4649

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
50055318
Subject category
S58: GEOSCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
GROUND MOTION; NATURAL GAS FIELDS; RAYLEIGH WAVES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOMOGRAPHY; WAVE PROPAGATION
Descriptors DEC
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; GEOLOGIC DEPOSITS; MINERAL RESOURCES; MOTION; NATURAL GAS DEPOSITS; RESOURCES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 The Author(s)