Comparison of total mercury and methylmercury cycling at five sites using the small watershed approach
Creators
- 1. US Geological Survey, PO Box 628, Montpelier, VT 05601 (United States)
- 2. US Geological Survey, MS 415 Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 (United States)
- 3. US Geological Survey, 3215 Marine Street, Suite E-127, Boulder, CO 80303 (United States)
- 4. US Geological Survey, 8505 Research Way, Middleton, WI 53562 (United States)
- 5. US Geological Survey, 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130, Atlanta, GA 30360 (United States)
- 6. US Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd., MS 480, Menlo Park, CA 94025 (United States)
- 7. Environmental Chemistry and Technology and Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 (United States)
Description
The small watershed approach is well-suited but underutilized in mercury research. We applied the small watershed approach to investigate total mercury (THg) and methylmercury (MeHg) dynamics in streamwater at the five diverse forested headwater catchments of the US Geological Survey Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Budgets (WEBB) program. At all sites, baseflow THg was generally less than 1 ng L-1 and MeHg was less than 0.2 ng L-1. THg and MeHg concentrations increased with streamflow, so export was primarily episodic. At three sites, THg and MeHg concentration and export were dominated by the particulate fraction in association with POC at high flows, with maximum THg (MeHg) concentrations of 94 (2.56) ng L-1 at Sleepers River, Vermont; 112 (0.75) ng L-1 at Rio Icacos, Puerto Rico; and 55 (0.80) ng L-1 at Panola Mt., Georgia. Filtered (<0.7 μm) THg increased more modestly with flow in association with the hydrophobic acid fraction (HPOA) of DOC, with maximum filtered THg concentrations near 5 ng L-1 at both Sleepers and Icacos. At Andrews Creek, Colorado, THg export was also episodic but was dominated by filtered THg, as POC concentrations were low. MeHg typically tracked THg so that each site had a fairly constant MeHg/THg ratio, which ranged from near zero at Andrews to 15% at the low-relief, groundwater-dominated Allequash Creek, Wisconsin. Allequash was the only site with filtered MeHg consistently above detection, and the filtered fraction dominated both THg and MeHg. Relative to inputs in wet deposition, watershed retention of THg (minus any subsequent volatilization) was 96.6% at Allequash, 60% at Sleepers, and 83% at Andrews. Icacos had a net export of THg, possibly due to historic gold mining or frequent disturbance from landslides. Quantification and interpretation of Hg dynamics was facilitated by the small watershed approach with emphasis on event sampling. - High-flow sampling reveals strong contrasts in total mercury and methylmercury cycling in five diverse USA watersheds
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.031Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.031;
- PII
- S0269-7491(07)00604-5;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Environmental Pollution (1987)
- Journal Volume
- 154
- Journal Issue
- 1
- Journal Page Range
- p. 143-154
- ISSN
- 0269-7491
- CODEN
- ENPOEK
Conference
- Title
- 8. international conference on mercury as a global pollutant
- Acronym
- ICMGP 2006
- Dates
- 7-11 Aug 2006
- Place
- Madison, WI (United States)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 40014607
- Subject category
- S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- EVAPORATION; GROUND WATER; LANDSLIDES; MERCURY; METHYLMERCURY; MINING; PUERTO RICO; RETENTION; SAMPLING; STREAMS; WASHOUT; WATERSHEDS
- Descriptors DEC
- DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ELEMENTS; FALLOUT; GREATER ANTILLES; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; ISLANDS; LATIN AMERICA; METALS; NORTH AMERICA; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC MERCURY COMPOUNDS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PHASE TRANSFORMATIONS; RIVERS; SURFACE WATERS; USA; WATER; WEST INDIES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.