Published August 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

18F-FDG PET response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma are different

  • 1. Philippine General Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Manila (Philippines)
  • 2. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Service, East Melbourne, VIC (Australia)
  • 3. Saint Vincent's Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, East Melbourne, VIC (Australia)
  • 4. Saint Vincent's Hospital, Department of Pathology, Melbourne (Australia)
  • 5. The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Centre for Cancer Imaging, Translational Research Group, Molecular Imaging and Targeted Therapeutics Laboratory, East Melbourne, VIC (Australia)
  • 6. University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Melbourne (Australia)

Description

Ewing sarcoma (ES) and osteosarcoma (OS) have different biological characteristics and respond differently to chemotherapy. We reviewed 18F-FDG PET imaging characteristics of ES and OS patients at baseline and following treatment to determine whether this biological variation is reflected in their imaging phenotype. A retrospective review of ES and OS patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery was done, correlating PET results with histologic response to chemotherapy. Change in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) between baseline and post-treatment scanning was not significantly associated with histologic response for either ES or OS. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and the percentage of injected 18F-FDG dose (%ID) in the primary tumor were found to be different for ES and OS response subgroups. A 50% reduction in MTV (MTV2:1 < 0.5) was found to be significantly associated with favorable histologic response in OS. Using the same criteria for ES incorrectly predicted good responders. Increasing the cut-off values for ES to a 90% reduction in MTV (MTV2:1 < 0.1) resulted in association with favorable histologic response. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as reflected by changes in PET characteristics should be interpreted differently for ES and OS. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1096-4

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Skeletal Radiology
Journal Volume
40
Journal Issue
8
Journal Page Range
p. 1007-1015
ISSN
0364-2348
CODEN
SKRADI