Fuel cycle cost considerations of increased discharge burnups
Creators
- 1. Westinghouse Nuclear Commercial Operations Division Fuel and Field Services Evaluations, P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230
Description
Evaluations are presented that indicate the attainment of increased discharge burnups in light water reactors will depend on economic factors particular to individual operators. In addition to pure resource conserving effects and assuming continued reliable fuel performance, a substantial economic incentive must exist to justify the longer operating times necessary to achieve higher burnups. Whether such incentive will exist or not will depend on relative price levels of all fuel cycle cost components, utility operating practices, and resolution of uncertainties associated with the back-end of the fuel cycle. It is concluded that implementation of increased burnups will continue at a graduated pace similar to past experience, rather than finding universal acceptance of particular increased levels at any particular time
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Nucl. Technol.
- Journal Volume
- 56
- Journal Issue
- 1
- Series
- Nucl. Technol.
- Journal Page Range
- 106-111
- ISSN
- 0029-5450
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 15072948
- Subject category
- S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS;
- Descriptors DEI
- BURNUP; BWR TYPE REACTORS; COST; ECONOMICS; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; FUEL CYCLE; FUEL MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; PWR TYPE REACTORS; REACTOR FUELING; RESOURCE CONSERVATION; SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS
- Descriptors DEC
- ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; MANAGEMENT; NUCLEAR MATERIALS MANAGEMENT; POWER REACTORS; PUBLIC UTILITIES; REACTORS; THERMAL REACTORS; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS