Published January 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

A multi-actor multi-criteria framework to assess the stakeholder support for different biofuel options. The case of Belgium

  • 1. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, MOSI-Transport and Logistics, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel (Belgium)
  • 2. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, ETEC, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel (Belgium)
  • 3. Erasmushogeschool Brussel, Nijverheidskaai 170, B-1070 Brussel (Belgium)
  • 4. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, MECH, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel (Belgium)
  • 5. Universite Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Croix du Sud 2, bte 11, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium)
  • 6. VITO, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol (Belgium)

Description

The multi-actor multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA) is a methodology to evaluate different policy measures, whereby different stakeholders' opinions are explicitly taken into account. In this paper, the framework is used to assess several biofuel options for Belgium that can contribute to the binding target of 10% renewable fuels in transport by 2020, issued by the Renewable Energy Directive (RED). Four biofuel options (biodiesel, ethanol, biogas and synthetic biodiesel (also referred to as 'biomass-to-liquid' or BTL)) together with a reference fossil fuel option, are evaluated on the aims and objectives of the different stakeholders involved in the biofuel supply chain (feedstock producers, biofuel producers, fuel distributors, end users, vehicle manufacturers, government, NGOs and North-South organizations). Overall, the MAMCA provided insights in the stakeholder's position and possible implementation problems for every biofuel option. As such, it helps decision makers in establishing a supportive policy framework to facilitate implementation and to ensure market success, once they have decided on which biofuel option (or combination of options) to implement. (author)

Availability note (English)

Available from Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.033

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
39
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 200-214
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Optional Information

Notes
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved