Published August 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

A decision support assessment of cogeneration plant for a community energy system in Korea

  • 1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 214-1 Dae-dong, Kyungsan 712–749 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. School of Economics and Finance, Yeungnam University, 214-1 Dae-dong, Kyungsan 712–749 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 3. Department of Electrical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 214-1 Dae-dong, Kyungsan 712–749 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 4. Korea Institute of Energy Research, 152 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305–343 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 5. Division of Economics, Nanyang Technological University, HSS-04–65, 14 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637332 (Singapore)

Description

We have undertaken a case study of a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant applied to a mixture of buildings comprising residential premises, offices, hospitals, stores, and schools in Korea. We proposed five Plans for grouping buildings in the complex and estimated the annual 8760-hourly demands for electricity, cooling, heating, and hot water. For each Plan, we built about ten Scenarios for system construction. Then, we simulated the operation of the system to find the fuel consumption, electricity purchase, and heat recovery. Applying the local rates to the amounts of fuel and electricity, we estimated the operating costs. Combining the operating cost with the initial cost associated with the purchase and construction of the system, we calculated the payback periods for the scenarios. We found that the payback period can be as short as two years for smartly grouped buildings with a generator capacity of around 50% of the peak electricity demand. A progressive electricity rate that applies only to residential premises currently plays a key role in the economic merits. We recommend extending a sound progressive system to other types of building in Korea to promote distributed power production and enhance energy saving practices in general. - Highlights: ►We case-studied cogeneration plants for a residential complex in Korea. ►We estimated the annual 8760-hourly demands for electricity, heating, and cooling. ► We simulated the operation of CHP and estimated the fuel and electricity costs. ► We found payback periods that were shorter than two years for well-planned systems. ► A progressive electricity tariff plays a key role in the economic merits.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.002

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.002;
PII
S0301-4215(12)00399-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
47
Journal Page Range
p. 365-383
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.