Published June 1, 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

The Relationship Between Human Papillomavirus Status and Other Molecular Prognostic Markers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

  • 1. Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)
  • 2. Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)
  • 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)
  • 4. Biochemistry-Genome Center, Stanford University, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)
  • 5. Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)

Description

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between human papillomavirus (HPV) status and known prognostic makers for head and neck cancers including tumor hypoxia, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and intratumoral T-cell levels and to determine the prognostic impact of these markers by HPV status. Methods and Materials: HPV status in 82 evaluable head and neck squamous cell carcinomas patients was determined by pyrosequencing and related to p16INK4a staining and treatment outcomes. It was correlated with tumor hypoxia (tumor pO2 and carbonic anhydrase [CAIX] staining), EGFR status, and intratumoral lymphocyte expression (CD3 staining). Results: Forty-four percent of evaluable tumors had strong HPV signal by pyrosequencing. There was a significant relationship between strong HPV signal and p16INK4a staining as well as oropharynx location. The strong HPV signal group fared significantly better than others, both in time to progression (TTP, p = 0.008) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.004) for all patients and for the oropharyngeal subset. Positive p16INK4a staining was associated with better TTP (p = 0.014) and OS (p = 0.00002). There was no relationship between HPV status and tumor pO2 or CAIX staining. However, HPV status correlated inversely with EGFR reactivity (p = 0.0006) and directly with CD3(+) T-lymphocyte level (p = 0.03). Whereas CAIX and EGFR overexpression were negative prognostic factors regardless of HPV status, CD3(+) T-cell levels was prognostic only in HPV(-) tumors. Conclusion: HPV status was a prognostic factor for progression and survival. It correlated inversely with EGFR expression and directly with T-cell infiltration. The prognostic effect of CAIX and EGFR expression was not influenced by HPV status, whereas intratumoral T-cell levels was significant only for HPV(-) tumors.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.015

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.015;
PII
S0360-3016(09)00247-8;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
74
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 553-561
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.