Validation process and uncertainty budget: A recommended approach for performance verification
Creators
- 1. Div. of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety, International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramerstrasse 5, A-1400 Vienna (Austria)
Description
Within its Occupational Radiation Protection Programme, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) initiated and funded many international and regional intercomparison exercises, with the aim of verifying performance of the individual monitoring service providers. An important component within the quality system is the validation and uncertainty budget of the method used. Each method must be validated. This validation process must provide evidence that the method can fulfil all requirements for its intended use. A method may be regarded as validated only when it fulfils all requirements established before the validation process. This paper reviews methods recommended for different types of measurement techniques in individual monitoring. (authors)
Availability note (English)
Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncl135Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1093/rpd/ncl135;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry
- Journal Volume
- 125
- Journal Issue
- 1-4
- Journal Page Range
- p. 52-55
- ISSN
- 0144-8420
Conference
- Title
- European Workshop on Individual Monitoring of Ionising Radiation
- Acronym
- IM2005
- Dates
- 11-15 Apr 2005
- Place
- Vienna (Austria)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- France
- INIS RN
- 44023949
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- BODY BURDEN; BUDGETS; HUMAN POPULATIONS; IAEA; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIATION PROTECTION; REVIEWS; RISK ASSESSMENT; VALIDATION; VERIFICATION
- Descriptors DEC
- CONTROL; DOCUMENT TYPES; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; MONITORING; POPULATIONS; TESTING
Optional Information
- Notes
- 17 refs