Published May 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

CO2 content of electricity losses

  • 1. University of Barcelona, Barcelona Institute of Economics (IEB), Chair of Energy Sustainability (Spain)
  • 2. EPEE, Université d´Evry Val d´Essonne (France)
  • 3. University of Barcelona, University of Warwick & Barcelona Institute of Economics (IEB), Chair of Energy Sustainability (Spain)

Description

Countries are implementing policies to develop greener energy markets worldwide. In Europe, the ¨2030 Energy and Climate Package¨ asks for further reductions of green house gases, renewable sources integration, and energy efficiency targets. But the polluting intensity of electricity may be different in average than when considering market inefficiencies, in particular losses, and therefore the implemented policy must take those differences into account. Precisely, herein we study the importance in terms of CO2 emissions the extra amount of energy necessary to cover losses. With this purpose we use Spanish market and system data with hourly frequency from 2011 to 2013. Our results show that indeed electricity losses significantly explain CO2 emissions, with a higher CO2 emissions rate when covering losses than the average rate of the system. Additionally, we find that the market closing technologies used to cover losses have a positive and significant impact on CO2 emissions: when polluting technologies (coal or combined cycle) close the market, the impact of losses on CO2 emissions is high compared to the rest of technologies (combined heat and power, renewables or hydropower). To the light of these results we make some policy recommendations to reduce the impact of losses on CO2 emissions. - Highlights: • Electricity losses significantly explain CO2 emissions. • Policies aimed to reducing losses have a positive impact on CO2 emissions. • The market closing technology used to cover losses have impacts on CO2 emissions. • Pollutant technologies that close the market should be replaced by renewables.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.011

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.011;
PII
S0301-4215(17)30011-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
104
Journal Page Range
p. 439-445
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.