Published March 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Preventing damage and redeposition during focused ion beam milling: The "umbrella" method

  • 1. Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Den Dolech 2, 5612 AZ Eindhoven (Netherlands)
  • 2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • A novel masking methodology is introduced to prevent FIB-induced damage during milling operations. • Micron-sized blocks of compliant polymer masks are produced and optimized for the purpose of minimizing surface damage. • High angular resolution EBSD is shown to be a sensitive technique to capture FIB-induced surface damage, and to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. - Abstract: Focused ion beam (FIB) milling has enabled the development of key microstructure characterization techniques (e.g. 3D electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), 3D scanning electron microscopy imaging, site-specific sample preparation for transmission electron microscopy, site-specific atom probe tomography), and micro-mechanical testing techniques (e.g. micro-pillar compression, micro-beam bending, in-situ TEM nanoindentation). Yet, in most milling conditions, some degree of FIB damage is introduced via material redeposition, Ga+ ion implantation or another mechanism. The level of damage and its influence vary strongly with milling conditions and materials characteristics, and cannot always be minimized. Here, a masking technique is introduced, that employs standard FIB-SEM equipment to protect specific surfaces from redeposition and ion implantation. To investigate the efficiency of this technique, high angular resolution EBSD (HR-EBSD) has been used to monitor the quality of the top surface of several micro-pillars, as they were created by milling a ringcore hole in a stress-free silicon wafer, with or without protection due to an "umbrella". HR-EBSD provides a high-sensitivity estimation of the amount of FIB damage on the surface. Without the umbrella, EBSD patterns are severely influenced, especially within 5 µm of the milled region. With an optimized umbrella, sharp diffraction patterns are obtained near the hole, as revealed by average cross correlation factors greater than 0.9 and equivalent phantom strains of the order 2 × 10−4. Thus, the umbrella method is an efficient and versatile tool to support a variety of FIB based techniques.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.12.012

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.12.012;
PII
S0304399117304060;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Ultramicroscopy (Amsterdam)
Journal Volume
186
Journal Page Range
p. 35-41
ISSN
0304-3991
CODEN
ULTRD6

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.