Applying HAZOP analysis in assessing remote handling compatibility of ITER port plugs
Creators
- 1. NRG, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group, Safety and Power, Dept. Risk Management Consultancy, Utrechtseweg 310, R42, P.O. Box 9034, 6800 ES Arnhem (Netherlands)
- 2. NRG, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group, Irradiation and Development, Westerduinweg 3, Petten, P.O. Box 25, 1755 ZG Petten (Netherlands)
- 3. DIFFER Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, Association EURATOM-FOM, Partner in the Trilateral Euregio Cluster and ITER-NL, P.O. Box 1207, 3430 BE Nieuwegein (Netherlands)
- 4. Heemskerk Innovative Technology, Merelhof 2, 2172 HZ Sassenheim (Netherlands)
Description
Highlights: ► We applied HAZOP analysis to assess the criticality of remote handling maintenance activities on port plugs in the ITER Hot Cell facility. ► We identified several weak points in the general upper port plug maintenance concept. ► We made clear recommendations on redesign in port plug design, operational sequence and Hot Cell equipment. ► The use of a HAZOP approach for the ECH UL port can also be applied to ITER port plugs in general. -- Abstract: This paper describes the application of a Hazard and Operability Analysis (HAZOP) methodology in assessing the criticality of remote handling maintenance activities on port plugs in the ITER Hot Cell facility. As part of the ECHUL consortium, the remote handling team at the DIFFER Institute is developing maintenance tools and procedures for critical components of the ECH Upper launcher (UL). Based on NRG's experience with nuclear risk analysis and Hot Cell procedures, early versions of these tool concepts and maintenance procedures were subjected to a HAZOP analysis. The analysis identified several weak points in the general upper port plug maintenance concept and led to clear recommendations on redesigns in port plug design, the operational sequence and ITER Hot Cell equipment. The paper describes the HAZOP methodology and illustrates its application with specific procedures: the Steering Mirror Assembly (SMA) replacement and the exchange of the Mid Shield Optics (MSO) in the ECH UPL. A selection of recommended changes to the launcher design associated with the accessibility, maintainability and manageability of replaceable components are presented
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.12.002Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.12.002;
- PII
- S0920-3796(12)00548-0;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Fusion Engineering and Design
- Journal Volume
- 88
- Journal Issue
- 9-10
- Journal Page Range
- p. 2688-2693
- ISSN
- 0920-3796
- CODEN
- FEDEEE
Conference
- Title
- 27. symposium on fusion technology
- Acronym
- SOFT-27
- Dates
- 24-28 Sep 2012
- Place
- Liege (Belgium)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 45054108
- Subject category
- S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- CLOSURES; DESIGN; ECR HEATING; HOT CELLS; ITER TOKAMAK; MAINTENANCE; OPTICS; RECOMMENDATIONS; REMOTE HANDLING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIELDS
- Descriptors DEC
- CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; EQUIPMENT; HEATING; HIGH-FREQUENCY HEATING; LABORATORY EQUIPMENT; PLASMA HEATING; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES; THERMONUCLEAR REACTORS; TOKAMAK DEVICES; TOKAMAK TYPE REACTORS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.