Published October 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Applying HAZOP analysis in assessing remote handling compatibility of ITER port plugs

  • 1. NRG, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group, Safety and Power, Dept. Risk Management Consultancy, Utrechtseweg 310, R42, P.O. Box 9034, 6800 ES Arnhem (Netherlands)
  • 2. NRG, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group, Irradiation and Development, Westerduinweg 3, Petten, P.O. Box 25, 1755 ZG Petten (Netherlands)
  • 3. DIFFER Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, Association EURATOM-FOM, Partner in the Trilateral Euregio Cluster and ITER-NL, P.O. Box 1207, 3430 BE Nieuwegein (Netherlands)
  • 4. Heemskerk Innovative Technology, Merelhof 2, 2172 HZ Sassenheim (Netherlands)

Description

Highlights: ► We applied HAZOP analysis to assess the criticality of remote handling maintenance activities on port plugs in the ITER Hot Cell facility. ► We identified several weak points in the general upper port plug maintenance concept. ► We made clear recommendations on redesign in port plug design, operational sequence and Hot Cell equipment. ► The use of a HAZOP approach for the ECH UL port can also be applied to ITER port plugs in general. -- Abstract: This paper describes the application of a Hazard and Operability Analysis (HAZOP) methodology in assessing the criticality of remote handling maintenance activities on port plugs in the ITER Hot Cell facility. As part of the ECHUL consortium, the remote handling team at the DIFFER Institute is developing maintenance tools and procedures for critical components of the ECH Upper launcher (UL). Based on NRG's experience with nuclear risk analysis and Hot Cell procedures, early versions of these tool concepts and maintenance procedures were subjected to a HAZOP analysis. The analysis identified several weak points in the general upper port plug maintenance concept and led to clear recommendations on redesigns in port plug design, the operational sequence and ITER Hot Cell equipment. The paper describes the HAZOP methodology and illustrates its application with specific procedures: the Steering Mirror Assembly (SMA) replacement and the exchange of the Mid Shield Optics (MSO) in the ECH UPL. A selection of recommended changes to the launcher design associated with the accessibility, maintainability and manageability of replaceable components are presented

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.12.002

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.12.002;
PII
S0920-3796(12)00548-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Fusion Engineering and Design
Journal Volume
88
Journal Issue
9-10
Journal Page Range
p. 2688-2693
ISSN
0920-3796
CODEN
FEDEEE

Conference

Title
27. symposium on fusion technology
Acronym
SOFT-27
Dates
24-28 Sep 2012
Place
Liege (Belgium)

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
45054108
Subject category
S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
CLOSURES; DESIGN; ECR HEATING; HOT CELLS; ITER TOKAMAK; MAINTENANCE; OPTICS; RECOMMENDATIONS; REMOTE HANDLING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIELDS
Descriptors DEC
CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; EQUIPMENT; HEATING; HIGH-FREQUENCY HEATING; LABORATORY EQUIPMENT; PLASMA HEATING; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES; THERMONUCLEAR REACTORS; TOKAMAK DEVICES; TOKAMAK TYPE REACTORS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.