Published October 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

A CFD-based design optimization of air-cooled passive decay heat removal system

  • 1. Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology (KAIST), Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-701 (Korea, Republic of)

Description

Highlights: • Air-cooled Passive decay heat removal (APDHR) system was suggested for passive long-term decay heat removal. • Fin geometry optimization for finned heat exchanger was performed using CFD. • Design parameters including pitch, height and wall temperature difference were checked and determined by CFD. • Preliminary analysis of the heat removal capability of APDHR was conducted. - Abstract: The concept of the APDHR (Air-cooled Passive Decay Heat Removal) system was suggested to preserve the safety of a nuclear reactor during accidents. Until 3 days after the reactor shutdown caused by non-LOCA accident, water in the Passive Condensate Cooling Tank (PCCT) was used to condense the steam in secondary side. Since then, the steam was cooled by natural convection of air passively and indefinitely. The focus on this study is on the system performance during the natural convection period. Both, finned and bare heat exchangers (HXs) were considered for the design optimization of the APDHR. As a result, fin height of 4 cm, fin spacing of 4 cm and fin thickness of 0.2 cm was determined as a reference fin geometry regarding heat removal capacity and economic fin installation. Then, the sensitivity of several design parameters of APDHR, such as pitch, height, wall temperature of the HXs and the interval of spacer grids, was checked and determined in a viewpoint of better heat removal capacity and compact construction. The pitch between HXs was determined as 20 cm with the outer diameter of HXs were 5.08 cm, and the height of the HXs was decided as 10 m through the height sensitivity study. Based on the results, the numbers of HXs and PCCTs were analyzed considering the decay heat of 3 days after the shutdown to suggest the overall design of the APDHR. The heat transfer coefficients were 10.07 W/m2K and 15.76 W/m2K in the case of the bare and the finned HXs, respectively. Therefore, the numbers of HXs and PCCTs required can be reduced by using the finned HXs.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.07.008

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.07.008;
PII
S0029549318305703;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Journal Volume
337
Journal Page Range
p. 351-363
ISSN
0029-5493
CODEN
NEDEAU

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
50082288
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
AFTER-HEAT REMOVAL; DECAY; DESIGN; FINS; HEAT EXCHANGERS; HEIGHT; NATURAL CONVECTION; OPTIMIZATION; PITCHES; REACTOR SHUTDOWN; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STEAM; TEMPERATURE MONITORING
Descriptors DEC
CONVECTION; DIMENSIONS; ENERGY TRANSFER; HEAT TRANSFER; MASS TRANSFER; MONITORING; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OTHER ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; REACTOR LIFE CYCLE; REMOVAL; SHUTDOWN

Optional Information

Notes
© 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.