Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen process in comparison with coal-to-hydrogen process
- 1. Shandong Collaborative Innovation Center of Eco-Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266042 (China)
- 2. College of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266042 (China)
- 3. School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083 (China)
Description
Highlights: • Biomass-to-hydrogen (BTH) shows better performances on production cost. • Coal-to-hydrogen (CTH) shows better performances on raw material consumption and TCI. • Techno-economic performance of CTH and BTH is conducted and compared. • BTH has a superior performance in terms of its resistance to price risk than CTH process. -- Abstract: Hydrogen is a key raw material for many chemical processes and a clean fuel for various power generation strategies. Coal-to-hydrogen (CTH) conversion is an alternative way to produce hydrogen that is applicable to the abundant coal reserves in China. The use of fossil energy has contributed to severe environmental problems, which drives the development of potential hydrogen production processes. Biomass is a promising renewable energy as well as an attractive resource for producing hydrogen, and it may address some of these environmental problems. In this paper, the simulation results of the biomass-to-hydrogen (BTH) and CTH processes were validated using available experimental data from the literature. Based on the simulation results, a techno-economic analysis was conducted from the viewpoints of the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The techno-economic analysis included determination of the energy efficiency, material consumption, total capital investment, production cost and carbon tax. The energy efficiencies of BTH and CTH were 37.88% and 37.82%, respectively. The BTH process had a larger raw material consumption and total capital investment (TCI) than the CTH process. However, the BTH process had a lower production cost and GHG emissions than the CTH process. The results of energy analyses of the BTH and CTH processes showed that the energy efficiency can be improved from a thermodynamic perspective. The combination of thermodynamic analysis and techno-economic performance evaluation provides insights into the improvement and operation of clean hydrogen production.
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.119;
- PII
- S0360544219314616;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 185
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1063-1075
- ISSN
- 0360-5442
- CODEN
- ENEYDS
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 55014947
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S08: HYDROGEN;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOMASS; CAPITAL; CARBON; COAL; COAL RESERVES; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; COST; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY ANALYSIS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; INVESTMENT; PERFORMANCE; POWER GENERATION; RAW MATERIALS; THERMODYNAMICS
- Descriptors DEC
- CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; ECONOMICS; EFFICIENCY; ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; MATERIALS; NONMETALS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; RESERVES; RESOURCES; SIMULATION
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.