Published July 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Economic impacts of natural gas flow disruptions between Russia and the EU

  • 1. European Commission, Eurostat, L-2920 (Luxembourg)
  • 2. University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics and Business, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen (Netherlands)

Description

In this paper we use a non-linear programming approach to predict the wider interregional and interindustry impacts of natural gas flow disruptions. In the short run, economic actors attempt to continue their business-as-usual and follow established trade patters as closely as possible. In the model this is modelled by minimizing the information gain between the original pattern of economic transactions and the situation in which natural gas flows are disrupted. We analyze four scenarios that simulate Russian export stops of natural gas by means of a model calibrated on an international input-output table with six sectors and six regions. The simulations show that at the lower levels of aggregation considerable effects are found. At the aggregate level of the whole economy, however, the impacts of the four scenarios are negligible for Europe and only a little less so for Russia itself. Interestingly, the effects on the size of the economy, as measured by its GDP, are predominantly positive for the various European regions, but negative for Russia. The effects on the welfare of the populations involved, however, as measured by the size of domestic final demand, have an opposite sign; with predominantly negligible but negative effects for European regions, and very small positive effects for the Russian population. - Highlights: • First application of new model for wider economic impacts of disasters and trade boycotts. • Russian natural gas export stops would have considerable impacts on international gas flows. • Wider economic impacts on the EU are negligible. Those on Russia only a little larger. • Impacts on GDP are positive for the EU and negative for Russia. • Impacts on welfare (domestic final demand) have an opposite sign.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.030

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.030;
PII
S0301-4215(17)30174-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
106
Journal Page Range
p. 288-297
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.