Economic impacts of natural gas flow disruptions between Russia and the EU
Creators
- 1. European Commission, Eurostat, L-2920 (Luxembourg)
- 2. University of Groningen, Faculty of Economics and Business, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen (Netherlands)
Description
In this paper we use a non-linear programming approach to predict the wider interregional and interindustry impacts of natural gas flow disruptions. In the short run, economic actors attempt to continue their business-as-usual and follow established trade patters as closely as possible. In the model this is modelled by minimizing the information gain between the original pattern of economic transactions and the situation in which natural gas flows are disrupted. We analyze four scenarios that simulate Russian export stops of natural gas by means of a model calibrated on an international input-output table with six sectors and six regions. The simulations show that at the lower levels of aggregation considerable effects are found. At the aggregate level of the whole economy, however, the impacts of the four scenarios are negligible for Europe and only a little less so for Russia itself. Interestingly, the effects on the size of the economy, as measured by its GDP, are predominantly positive for the various European regions, but negative for Russia. The effects on the welfare of the populations involved, however, as measured by the size of domestic final demand, have an opposite sign; with predominantly negligible but negative effects for European regions, and very small positive effects for the Russian population. - Highlights: • First application of new model for wider economic impacts of disasters and trade boycotts. • Russian natural gas export stops would have considerable impacts on international gas flows. • Wider economic impacts on the EU are negligible. Those on Russia only a little larger. • Impacts on GDP are positive for the EU and negative for Russia. • Impacts on welfare (domestic final demand) have an opposite sign.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.030Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.030;
- PII
- S0301-4215(17)30174-X;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 106
- Journal Page Range
- p. 288-297
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48086543
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- AGGLOMERATION; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ECONOMY; ENERGY DEMAND; EUROPEAN UNION; GAIN; GAS FLOW; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; MATERIAL BALANCE; NATURAL DISASTERS; NATURAL GAS; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; RUSSIAN FEDERATION
- Descriptors DEC
- AMPLIFICATION; CALCULATION METHODS; DEMAND; EASTERN EUROPE; ENERGY SOURCES; EUROPE; FLUID FLOW; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.