Published December 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Validation of Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting with 24-h plasma clearance in cirrhotic patients with ascites

  • 1. General Hospital, Nuclear Medicine, St. John's, Newfoundland (Canada)
  • 2. Memorial University of Newfoundland, Radiology, St. John's, NL (Canada)
  • 3. Royal Free Hospital, The Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, London (United Kingdom)
  • 4. Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, Department of Medical Physics, London (United Kingdom)
  • 5. University of California, San Diego, Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, La Jolla, CA (United States)
  • 6. University of Saskatchewan, Radiology, Saskatoon, SK (Canada)

Description

The aim was to compare late-time extrapolation of plasma clearance (CL) from Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting (Tk-GV) and from mono-exponential (E1) fitting. Ten 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid bolus IV studies in adults - 8 with ascites - assessed for liver transplantation, with 12-16 plasma samples drawn from 5-min to 24-h, were fit with Tk-GV and E1 models and CL results were compared using Passing-Bablok fitting. The 24-h CL(Tk-GV) values ranged from 11.4 to 79.7 ml/min. Linear regression of 4- versus 24-h CL(Tk-GV) yielded no significant departure from a slope of 1, whereas the 4- versus 24-h CL(E1) slope, 1.56, was significantly increased. For CL(Tk-GV-24-h) versus CL(E1-24-h), there was a biased slope and intercept (0.85, 5.97 ml/min). Moreover, the quality of fitting of 24-h data was significantly better for Tk-GV than for E1, as follows. For 10 logarithm of concentration curves, higher r values were obtained for each Tk-GV fit (median 0.998) than for its corresponding E1 fit (median 0.965), with p < 0.0001 (paired t-test of z-statistics from Fisher r-z transformations). The E1 fit quality degraded with increasing V/W [volume of distribution (l) per kg body weight, p=0.003]. However, Tk-GV fit quality versus V/W was uncorrelated (p=0.8). CL(E1) values were dependent on sample time and the quality of fit was poor and degraded with increasing ascites, consistent with current opinion that CL(E1) is contraindicated in ascitic patients. CL(Tk-GV) was relatively more accurate and the good quality of fit was unaffected by ascites. CL(Tk-GV) was the preferred method for the accurate calculation of CL and was useful despite liver failure and ascites. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1887-9

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Journal Volume
38
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
p. 2247-2256
ISSN
1619-7070