Off-site modular construction and design in nuclear power: A systematic literature review
- 1. SMR, Rolls-Royce Plc (United Kingdom)
- 2. Institute for Innovation in Sustainable Engineering, University of Derby, DE13HD (United Kingdom)
- 3. School of Electronics, Computing and Mathematics, University of Derby (United Kingdom)
- 4. Nuclear Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre, University of Sheffield (United Kingdom)
Description
Highlights: • Systematic literature review presenting the current state-of-the-art on modular design and construction in nuclear power. • Identifies the relevant gap in knowledge and provides a research agenda for future research directions. • Identifies lessons learned from large nuclear modularisation and and current module designs and design processes. • Recommends further development and integration of analysis techniques and software with the module/ plant design process • Recommends further updated research into techniques utilised by automotive, aerospace, construction and chemical industries. Off-Site Modular Construction (OSMC) research has been a burgeoning research area over the past two decades due to low productivity of traditional construction methods. Some large Gen 3 reactors may employ an on-site assembly area similar to shipbuilding techniques. This OSMC productivity has attracted the interest of the nuclear industry with over 50+ designs in commercial development. Off-site modular construction has been estimated to reduce the capital cost of an SMR by up to 37.98% compared to a stick-built method. The IAEA highlights the first commercial SMR "shop built and road transported to site" has an earliest operation date of 2026 (IAEA, 2018). This research paper aims to understand the current state of modular design in nuclear power by reviewing current literature with a systematic literature review. What can new small modular reactor designs learn from modularisation in large nuclear. What design and analysis techniques have been developed that may aid the design considering design, schedule, transportation and supply chain? What is the state of the art in the module design process? The research provides knowledge gaps and recommendations for further research.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103664Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103664;
- PII
- S0149197021000354;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Progress in Nuclear Energy
- Journal Volume
- 134
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0149-1970
- CODEN
- PNENDE
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54016267
- Subject category
- S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
- Descriptors DEI
- CAPITALIZED COST; COMPUTER CODES; MODULAR STRUCTURES; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; NUCLEAR POWER; REACTOR DESIGN; REACTOR OPERATION; RECOMMENDATIONS; SMALL MODULAR REACTORS
- Descriptors DEC
- COST; DESIGN; INDUSTRY; OPERATION; POWER; REACTOR LIFE CYCLE; REACTORS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.