Published April 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Off-site modular construction and design in nuclear power: A systematic literature review

  • 1. SMR, Rolls-Royce Plc (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Institute for Innovation in Sustainable Engineering, University of Derby, DE13HD (United Kingdom)
  • 3. School of Electronics, Computing and Mathematics, University of Derby (United Kingdom)
  • 4. Nuclear Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre, University of Sheffield (United Kingdom)

Description

Highlights: • Systematic literature review presenting the current state-of-the-art on modular design and construction in nuclear power. • Identifies the relevant gap in knowledge and provides a research agenda for future research directions. • Identifies lessons learned from large nuclear modularisation and and current module designs and design processes. • Recommends further development and integration of analysis techniques and software with the module/ plant design process • Recommends further updated research into techniques utilised by automotive, aerospace, construction and chemical industries. Off-Site Modular Construction (OSMC) research has been a burgeoning research area over the past two decades due to low productivity of traditional construction methods. Some large Gen 3 reactors may employ an on-site assembly area similar to shipbuilding techniques. This OSMC productivity has attracted the interest of the nuclear industry with over 50+ designs in commercial development. Off-site modular construction has been estimated to reduce the capital cost of an SMR by up to 37.98% compared to a stick-built method. The IAEA highlights the first commercial SMR "shop built and road transported to site" has an earliest operation date of 2026 (IAEA, 2018). This research paper aims to understand the current state of modular design in nuclear power by reviewing current literature with a systematic literature review. What can new small modular reactor designs learn from modularisation in large nuclear. What design and analysis techniques have been developed that may aid the design considering design, schedule, transportation and supply chain? What is the state of the art in the module design process? The research provides knowledge gaps and recommendations for further research.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103664

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103664;
PII
S0149197021000354;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Journal Volume
134
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0149-1970
CODEN
PNENDE

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54016267
Subject category
S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
Descriptors DEI
CAPITALIZED COST; COMPUTER CODES; MODULAR STRUCTURES; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; NUCLEAR POWER; REACTOR DESIGN; REACTOR OPERATION; RECOMMENDATIONS; SMALL MODULAR REACTORS
Descriptors DEC
COST; DESIGN; INDUSTRY; OPERATION; POWER; REACTOR LIFE CYCLE; REACTORS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.